Regional differences in reported Covid-19 cases show genetic correlations with higher socio-economic status and better health, potentially confounding studies on the genetics of disease susceptibility
Abdellaoui, A.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSIn March 2020, England showed a rapid increase in Covid-19 cases. Susceptibility for infectious diseases like Covid-19 is likely to be partly genetic. Mapping the genetic susceptibility for Covid-19 outcomes may reveal biological mechanisms that could potentially aid in drug or vaccine developments. However, as the disease spreads unevenly across the country, regional allele frequency differences could become spuriously associated with disease prevalence. MethodsA regional genome-wide association study (RGWAS) was conducted in 396,042 individuals from England to investigate the association between 1.2 million genetic variants and regional differences in daily reported Covid-19 cases from March 1st to April 18th 2020. ResultsThe polygenic signal increases during the first weeks of March, peaking at March 13th with the measured genetic variants explaining [~]3% of the variance, including two genome-wide significant loci. The explained variance starts to drop at the end of March and reaches almost zero on April 18th. The majority of this temporary polygenic signal is due to genes associated with higher educational attainment and better health. ConclusionsThe temporary positive relationship between Covid-19 cases and regional socio-economic status (SES) at the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak may reflect 1) a higher degree of international travelers, 2) more social contacts, and/or 3) better testing capacities in higher SES regions. These signals are in the opposite direction of expected disease risk increasing effects, which has the potential to cancel out signals of interest. Genetic association studies should be aware of the timing and location of cases as this can introduce interfering polygenic signals that reflect regional differences in genes associated with behavior.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank 90%
- Relation of severe COVID-19 in Scotland to transmission-related factors and risk conditions eligible for shielding support: REACT-SCOT case-control study 90%
- Determinants of pre-vaccination antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding multimorbidity trajectories in Scotland: an application of sequence analysis 90%
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Saint Petersburg, Russia: a population-based study 89%
- How well does societal mobility restriction help control the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from real-time evaluation 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 International Border Surveillance Cohort Study at Toronto’s Pearson Airport 91%
- Social disparities in the first wave of COVID-19 infections in Germany: A county-scale explainable machine learning approach 90%
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.