Back

The SCF/KIT pathway implements self-organised epithelial patterning by cell movement

Chuyen, A.; Rulquin, C.; Thome, V.; Clement, R.; Kodjabachian, L.; Pasini, A.

2020-04-23 developmental biology
10.1101/2020.04.22.055483 bioRxiv
Show abstract

How individual cell behaviours lead to the emergence of global patterns is poorly understood. In the Xenopus embryonic epidermis, multiciliated cells (MCCs) are born in a random pattern within an inner mesenchymal layer, and subsequently intercalate at regular intervals into an outer epithelial layer. Using both experiments and mathematical modelling, we show that this transition from chaotic to ordered distribution relies on mutual repulsion among motile immature MCCs, and affinity towards outer-layer intercellular junctions. Consistently, ARP2/3-mediated actin remodelling is required for MCC pattern emergence. Using multiple functional approaches, we show that the Kit tyrosine kinase receptor, expressed in MCCs, and its ligand Scf, expressed in outer-layer cells, are both required for regular MCC distribution. While Scf behaves as a potent adhesive cue for MCCs, Kit expression is sufficient to confer order to a disordered heterologous cell population. Our work reveals how a single signalling system can implement self-organised large-scale patterning. Highlights- Immature multiciliated cells transit from a disordered to an ordered pattern - The transition is a self-organising process based on repulsive and affinity movements - ARP2/3-dependent actin remodelling is required for pattern emergence - The SCF/KIT pathway promotes both repulsion and affinity movements eTOC blurbIn developing Xenopus epidermis, immature multiciliated cells (MCCs), initially chaotically distributed within an inner layer, emerge in an orderly pattern among cells of the outer layer. This process involves MCC mutual repulsion and affinity towards outer-layer intercellular junctions. The SCF/KIT signalling pathway promotes both properties to allow regular MCC distribution.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.