Back

Potential magnitude of COVID-19-induced healthcare resource depletion in Ontario, Canada

Barrett, K.; Khan, Y. A.; Mac, S.; Ximenes, R.; Naimark, D. M.; Sander, B.

2020-04-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.19.20071712 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe global spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues in several jurisdictions, causing significant strain to healthcare systems. The purpose of our study is to predict the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient outcomes and the healthcare system in Ontario, Canada. MethodsWe developed an individual-level simulation to model the flow of COVID-19 patients through the Ontario healthcare system. We simulated different combined scenarios of epidemic trajectory and healthcare capacity. Outcomes include numbers of patients needing admission to the ward, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and requiring ventilation; days to resource depletion; and numbers of patients awaiting resources and deaths associated with limited access to resources. FindingsWe demonstrate that with effective early public health measures system resources need not be depleted. For scenarios considering late or ineffective implementation of physical distancing, health system resources would be depleted within 14-26 days. Resource depletion was also avoided or delayed with aggressive measures to rapidly increase ICU, ventilator, and acute care hospital capacity. InterpretationWe found that without aggressive physical distancing measures the Ontario healthcare system would have been inadequately equipped to manage the expected number of patients with COVID-19, despite the rapid capacity increase. This overall lack of resources would have led to an increase in mortality. By slowing the spread of the disease via ongoing public health measures and having increased healthcare capacity, Ontario may have avoided catastrophic stresses to its health care system.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
3
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
4
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.5%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.3%
14
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%