Using wastewater-based epidemiology with local indicators of opioid and illicit drug use to overcome data gaps in Montana
Margetts, M.; Keshaviah, A.; Hu, C.; Troeger, V.; Sykes, J.; Bishop, N.; Jones-Lepp, T.; Henry, M.; Keil, D. E.
Show abstract
Opioid misuse takes an enormous toll on the health and economy of the U.S., costing 130 lives per day, and an estimated 157 billion dollars per year. Mitigating the epidemic requires better information on the mix of drugs being used in a community and when and where drug use concentrates. Many widely used data sources, such as national population surveys, have a two-year lag before the data are available, and underestimate the prevalence of drug use because they rely on self-reported information about a stigmatized behavior. For rural populations, the data gap is compounded by privacy policies that suppress key information (for example, opioid-related death rates) in small populations. Municipal wastewater testing is an innovative approach to assessing community-level drug use that can provide near real-time, cost-effective, and unbiased measures of drug use. Importantly, wastewater-based data cannot reveal who is using a particular drug, mitigating privacy concerns. The methodology is routinely used across Europe and Australia as part of a holistic multi-indicator monitoring and alert system. When combined with geospatial mapping and advanced analytics, wastewater-based data can help locate geographic hotspots of use and provide an early warning for new substances entering into a community. We conducted a pilot study to compare temporal trends in estimates of per-capita drug use between wastewater-based data and other local data sources in two municipalities (one urban, one rural) in Montana. In the first phase of our study (Bishop et al, 2020, manuscript is in submission to Sci Total Environ), we optimized testing to estimate per-capita drug use in wastewater in an urban and rural municipality. Here, we report the value of these data for public health officials to predict rather than react to changes in drug use patterns. We also illustrate how rural populations can use the methodology to assess the impacts of local law enforcement efforts and evaluate the effectiveness of programs, such as the prescription take-back program, to improve public health and safety.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Wastewater-based Surveillance as a tool for monitoring and estimating COVID-19 incidence and trends: Insights from Germany, 2022-2024 93%
- Comprehensive Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Spread Using Wastewater-based Epidemiology Studies 93%
- Estimating Rates of Change to Interpret Quantitative Wastewater Surveillance of Disease Trends 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Monitoring drinking water quality in nationally representative household surveys: cross-sectional analysis of 20 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys 2014-2019 92%
- Association between combined sewer overflow events and gastrointestinal illness in Massachusetts municipalities with and without river-sourced drinking water, 2014-2019 91%
- Genetic variability in pathways associates with pesticide-induced nervous system disease in the United States 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive power of wastewater for nowcasting infectious disease transmission: a retrospective case study of five sewershed areas in Louisville, Kentucky 94%
- How early into the outbreak can surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater tell us? 93%
- Extraordinary levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in vertebrate animals at a New Mexico desert oasis: multiple pathways for wildlife and human exposure 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of SARS-CoV-2 digital droplet RT-PCR assay sensitivity on COVID-19 wastewater based epidemiology 93%
- Operationalizing a routine wastewater monitoring laboratory for SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Identifying trends in SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater to infer changing COVID-19 incidence: Effect of sampling frequency 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.