Back

Anthropogenic food enhancement alters the timing of maturational landmarks among wild savanna monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)

Schmitt, C. A.; Rich, A. M.; Parke, S.-A. R.; Blaszczyk, M. B.; Cramer, J. D.; Freimer, N. B.; Grobler, J. P.; Turner, T. R.

2020-04-20 zoology
10.1101/2020.04.18.048314 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ABSTRACTAnthropogenic landscapes are rapidly replacing natural nonhuman primate habitats. Yet, the access to anthropogenic resources on primate biology, health, and fitness remain poorly studied. Given their ubiquity across a range of human impacted landscapes, from cities to national parks, savanna monkeys (Chlorocebus spp.) provide an excellent study system in which to test these effects. We compared body condition and reproductive maturation in vervets (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) inhabiting a private farm in !Gariep Dam, with ample access to anthropogenic foods, and wild-foraging vervets in Soetdoring Nature Reserve, South Africa. Overall, vervets in !Gariep show significantly thicker skin folds, and higher BMI and body mass, than those in Soetdoring, suggesting increased fat deposition. Males in !Gariep have larger relative testis volumes at peri-pubescent ages compared to those in Soetdoring, suggesting early reproductive maturation associated with age-specific increases in body mass. Females from !Gariep showed evidence of an earlier onset of reproduction than those in Soetdoring, based on parity status as assessed by nipple length and evidence of lactation. Parity status at sub-adult dental ages was also strongly associated with body mass. These results are consistent with a positive effect of anthropogenic food-enhancement on body fat deposition, potentially linked to an earlier onset of reproductive maturation. Further investigation into primate responses to cultivated resources will inform our understanding of the broader effects of food enhancement on developmental plasticity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
7
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
8
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
15
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
17
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
25
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%