Back

Presence of SARS-CoV-2 reactive T cells in COVID-19 patients and healthy donors

Braun, J.; Loyal, L.; Frentsch, M.; Wendisch, D.; Georg, P.; Kurth, F.; Hippenstiel, S.; Dingeldey, M.; Kruse, B.; Fauchere, F.; Baysal, E.; Mangold, M.; Henze, L.; Lauster, R.; Mall, M.; Beyer, K.; Roehmel, J.; Schmitz, J.; Miltenyi, S.; Mueller, M. A.; Witzenrath, M.; Suttorp, N.; Kern, F.; Reimer, U.; Wenschuh, H.; Drosten, C.; Corman, V. M.; Giesecke-Thiel, C.; Sander, L.-E.; Thiel, A.

2020-04-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.17.20061440
Show abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a rapidly unfolding pandemic, overwhelming health care systems worldwide1. Clinical manifestations of Coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19) vary broadly, ranging from asymptomatic infection to acute respiratory failure and death2, yet the underlying mechanisms for this high variability are still unknown. Similarly, the role of host immune responses in viral clearance of COVID-19 remains unresolved. For SARS-CoV (2002/03), however, it has been reported that CD4+ T cell responses correlated with positive outcomes3,4, whereas T cell immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 have not yet been characterized. Here, we describe an assay that allows direct detection and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (S)-reactive CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood. We demonstrate the presence of S-reactive CD4+ T cells in 83% of COVID-19 patients, as well as in 34% of SARS-CoV-2 seronegative healthy donors (HD), albeit at lower frequencies. Strikingly, S-reactive CD4+ T cells in COVID-19 patients equally targeted N-terminal and C-terminal epitopes of S whereas in HD S-reactive CD4+ T cells reacted almost exclusively to the C-terminal epitopes that are a) characterized by higher homology with spike glycoprotein of human endemic "common cold" coronaviruses (hCoVs), and b) contains the S2 subunit of S with the cytoplasmic peptide (CP), the fusion peptide (FP), and the transmembrane domain (TM) but not the receptor-binding domain (RBD). In contrast to S-reactive CD4+ T cells in HD, S-reactive CD4+ T cells from COVID-19 patients co-expressed CD38 and HLA-DR, indivative of their recent in vivo activation. Our study is the first to directly measure SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cell responses providing critical tools for large scale testing and characterization of potential cross-reactive cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2. The presence of pre-existing SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells in a subset of SARS-CoV-2 naive HD is of high interest but larger scale prospective cohort studies are needed to assess whether their presence is a correlate of protection or pathology for COVID-19. Results of such studies will be key for a mechanistic understanding of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, adaptation of containment methods and to support vaccine development.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 0.5%
7.9%
2
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 1.0%
7.3%
3
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 12%
7.3%
4
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 0.4%
6.1%
5
Clinical & Translational Immunology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Science Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.1%
5.6%
7
Immunity
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 0.8%
4.3%
9
Cell
based on 28 papers
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
10
The Journal of Immunology
based on 19 papers
Top 0.3%
4.3%
11
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
12
Journal of Clinical Investigation
based on 50 papers
Top 0.7%
2.8%
13
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 1%
2.7%
14
Cell Reports
based on 25 papers
Top 0.5%
2.4%
15
Nature Immunology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
2.3%
16
PLOS Pathogens
based on 35 papers
Top 0.6%
2.2%
17
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 4%
1.5%
18
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 18%
1.5%
19
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 10%
1.3%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
22
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
23
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 79%
1.3%
24
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
25
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 97%
0.6%
26
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 8%
0.6%
27
EBioMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.6%