Increased PCR screening capacity using a multi-replicate pooling scheme
Viehweger, A.; Kühnl, F.; Brandt, C.; König, B.; Rodloff, A. C.
Show abstract
Effective public health response to viral outbreaks such as SARS-CoV-2 require reliable information about the spread of the infecting agent. Often real-time PCR screening of large populations is a feasible method to generate this information. Since test capacities are usually limited, pooling of test specimens is often necessary to increase screening capacity, provided that the test sensitivity is not significantly compromised. However, when a traditional pool is tested positive, all samples in the pool need individual retesting, which becomes ineffective at a higher proportion of positive samples. Here, we report a new pooling protocol that mitigates this problem by replicating samples across multiple pools. The resulting pool set allows the sample status to be resolved more often than with traditional pooling. At 2% prevalence and 20 samples per pool, our protocol increases screening capacity by factors of 5 and 2 compared to individual testing and traditional pooling, respectively. The corresponding software to layout and resolve samples is freely available under a BSD license (https://github.com/phiweger/clonepool).
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Interpretable Machine Learning to Massively Increase the Number of Antibody-Virus Interactions Across Studies 90%
- Estimating the relative proportions of SARS-CoV-2 strains from wastewater samples 90%
- A streamlined nanopore-compatible 5PSeq protocol for rapid phenotypic antimicrobial sensitivity testing 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-based pandemic preparedness: an infrastructure for population-scale genome-based based testing for COVID-19 92%
- Real-Time Selective Sequencing with RUBRIC: Read Until with Basecall and Reference-Informed Criteria 92%
- Efficient DNA-based data storage using shortmer combinatorial encoding 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.