Back

Transcriptional Difference between SARS-COV-2 and other Human Coronaviruses Revealed by Sub-genomic RNA Profiling

Lv, L.; Xie, X.; Gong, Q.; Feng, R.; Guo, X.; Su, B.; Chen, L.

2020-04-18 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.04.16.043224 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFundamental to viral biology is identification and annotation of viral genes and their function. Determining the level of coronavirus gene expression is inherently difficult due to the positive stranded RNA genome and the identification of sub-genomic RNAs (sgRNAs) that are required for expression of most viral genes. In the COVID-19 epidemic so far, few genomic studies have looked at viral sgRNAs and none have systematically examined the sgRNA profiles of large numbers of SARS-CoV2 datasets in conjuction with data for other coronaviruses. ResultsWe developed a bioinformatic pipeline to analyze the sgRNA profiles of coronaviruses and applied it to 588 individual samples from 20 independent studies, covering more than 10 coronavirus species. Our result showed that SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV each had a core sgRNA repertoire generated via a canonical mechanism. Novel sgRNAs that encode peptides with evolutionarily conserved structures were identified in several coronaviruses and were expressed in vitro and in vivo. Two novel peptides may have direct functional relevance to disease, by alluding interferon responses and disrupting IL17E (IL25) signaling. Relevant to coronavirus infectivity and transmission, we also observed that the level of Spike sgRNAs were significantly higher in-vivo than in-vitro, while the opposite held true for the Nucleocapside protein. ConclusionsOur results greatly expanded the predicted number of coronaviruses proteins and identified potential viral peptide suggested to be involved in viral virulence. These methods and findings shed new light on coronavirus biology and provides a valuable resource for future genomic studies of coronaviruses.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.