Back

Predictions, role of interventions and effects of a historic national lockdown in India's response to the COVID-19 pandemic: data science call to arms

Ray, D.; Salvatore, M.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Wang, L.; Mohammed, S.; Purkayastha, S.; Halder, A.; Rix, A.; Barker, D.; Kleinsasser, M.; Zhou, Y.; Song, P.; Bose, D.; Banerjee, M.; Baladandayuthapani, V.; Ghosh, P.; Mukherjee, B.

2020-04-18 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.04.15.20067256
Show abstract

ImportanceIndia has taken strong and early public health measures for arresting the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic. With only 536 COVID-19 cases and 11 fatalities, India - a democracy of 1.34 billion people - took the historic decision of a 21-day national lockdown on March 25. The lockdown was further extended to May 3rd, soon after the analysis of this paper was completed. ObjectiveTo study the short- and long-term impact of an initial 21-day lockdown on the total number of COVID-19 cases in India compared to other less severe non-pharmaceutical interventions using epidemiological forecasting models and Bayesian estimation algorithms; to compare effects of hypothetical durations of lockdown from an epidemiological perspective; to study alternative explanations for slower growth rate of the virus outbreak in India, including exploring the association of the number of cases and average monthly temperature; and finally, to outline the pivotal role of reliable and transparent data, reproducible data science methods, tools and products as we reopen the country and prepare for a post lock-down phase of the pandemic. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsWe use the daily data on the number of COVID-19 cases, of recovered and of deaths from March 1 until April 7, 2020 from the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Visual Dashboard operated by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering (JHU CSSE). Additionally, we use COVID-19 incidence counts data from Kaggle and the monthly average temperature of major cities across the world from Wikipedia. Main Outcome and MeasuresThe current time-series data on daily proportions of cases and removed (recovered and death combined) from India are analyzed using an extended version of the standard SIR (susceptible, infected, and removed) model. The eSIR model incorporates time-varying transmission rates that help us predict the effect of lockdown compared to other hypothetical interventions on the number of cases at future time points. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo implementation of this model provided predicted proportions of the cases at future time points along with credible intervals (CI). ResultsOur predicted cumulative number of COVID-19 cases in India on April 30 assuming a 1-week delay in peoples adherence to a 21-day lockdown (March 25 - April 14) and a gradual, moderate resumption of daily activities after April 14 is 9,181 with upper 95% CI of 72,245. In comparison, the predicted cumulative number of cases under "no intervention" and "social distancing and travel bans without lockdown" are 358 thousand and 46 thousand (upper 95% CI of nearly 2.3 million and 0.3 million) respectively. An effective lockdown can prevent roughly 343 thousand (upper 95% CI 1.8 million) and 2.4 million (upper 95% CI 38.4 million) COVID-19 cases nationwide compared to social distancing alone by May 15 and June 15, respectively. When comparing a 21-day lockdown with a hypothetical lockdown of longer duration, we find that 28-, 42-, and 56-day lockdowns can approximately prevent 238 thousand (upper 95% CI 2.3 million), 622 thousand (upper 95% CI 4.3 million), 781 thousand (upper 95% CI 4.6 million) cases by June 15, respectively. We find some suggestive evidence that the COVID-19 incidence rates worldwide are negatively associated with temperature in a crude unadjusted analysis with Pearson correlation estimates [95% confidence interval] between average monthly temperature and total monthly incidence around the world being -0.185 [-0.548, 0.236] for January, -0.110 [-0.362, 0.157] for February, and -0.173 [-0.314, -0.026] for March. Conclusions and RelevanceThe lockdown, if implemented correctly in the end, has a high chance of reducing the total number of COVID-19 cases in the short term, and buy India invaluable time to prepare its healthcare and disease monitoring system. Our analysis shows we need to have some measures of suppression in place after the lockdown for the best outcome. We cannot heavily rely on the hypothetical prevention governed by meteorological factors such as temperature based on current evidence. From an epidemiological perspective, a longer lockdown between 42-56 days is preferable. However, the lockdown comes at a tremendous price to social and economic health through a contagion process not dissimilar to that of the coronavirus itself. Data can play a defining role as we design post-lockdown testing, reopening and resource allocation strategies. SoftwareOur contribution to data science includes an interactive and dynamic app (covind19.org) with short- and long-term projections updated daily that can help inform policy and practice related to COVID-19 in India. Anyone can visualize the observed data for India and create predictions under hypothetical scenarios with quantification of uncertainties. We make our prediction codes freely available (https://github.com/umich-cphds/cov-ind-19) for reproducible science and for other COVID-19 affected countries to use them for their prediction and data visualization work.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 11%
11.5%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 49%
10.4%
3
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 0.5%
5.2%
4
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 25%
4.0%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 9%
4.0%
6
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 5%
2.6%
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 3%
2.5%
8
Infectious Disease Modelling
based on 50 papers
Top 3%
2.5%
9
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 4%
2.4%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 8%
1.8%
11
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
12
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
13
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 15%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 17%
1.6%
15
BMJ Global Health
based on 95 papers
Top 8%
1.6%
16
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Physics
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 7%
1.4%
19
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 9%
1.4%
21
BMC Research Notes
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
1.4%
22
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 21%
1.4%
23
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
24
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
26
Scientific Data
based on 30 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
27
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Public Health
based on 34 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Journal of Travel Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Nature Human Behaviour
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.7%