Exploring the causal effects of genetic liability to ADHD and Autism on Alzheimer's disease
Pagoni, P.; Dardani, C.; Leppert, B.; Korologou-Linden, R.; Davey Smith, G.; Howe, L. D.; Anderson, E. L.; Stergiakouli, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere are very few studies investigating possible links between Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Alzheimers disease and these have been limited by small sample sizes, diagnostic and recall bias. However, neurocognitive deficits affecting educational attainment in individuals with ADHD could be risk factors for Alzheimers later in life while hyper plasticity of the brain in ASD and strong positive genetic correlations of ASD with IQ and educational attainment could be protective against Alzheimers. MethodsWe estimated the bidirectional total causal effects of genetic liability to ADHD and ASD on Alzheimers disease through two-sample Mendelian randomization. We investigated their direct effects, independent of educational attainment and IQ, through Multivariable Mendelian randomization. ResultsThere was limited evidence to suggest that genetic liability to ADHD (OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.02, p=0.39) or ASD (OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.01, p=0.70) was associated with risk of Alzheimers disease. Similar causal effect estimates were identified when the direct effects, independent of educational attainment (ADHD: OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.01, p=0.07; ASD: OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.00, p=0.28) and IQ (ADHD: OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.02. p=0.29; ASD: OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.01, p=0.99), were assessed. Finally, genetic liability to Alzheimers disease was not found to have a causal effect on risk of ADHD or ASD (ADHD: OR=1.12, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.44, p=0.37; ASD: OR=1.19, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.51, p=0.14). ConclusionsIn the first study to date investigating the causal associations between genetic liability to ADHD, ASD and Alzheimers, within an MR framework, we found limited evidence to suggest a causal effect. It is important to encourage future research using ADHD and ASD specific subtype data, as well as longitudinal data in order to further elucidate any associations between these conditions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mitochondrial pathway polygenic risk scores are associated with Alzheimer's Disease 93%
- Failure to detect synergy between variants in transferrin and hemochromatosis and Alzheimer’s disease in large cohort 93%
- Explainable artificial intelligence identifies an AQP4 polymorphism-based risk score associated with brain amyloid burden 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genotype-Phenotype Correlation of T Cell Subtypes Reveals Senescent and Cytotoxic Genes in Alzheimer's Disease 90%
- Association of Whole-Person Eigen-Polygenic Risk Scores with Alzheimer's Disease 90%
- Disruption of a RAC1-centred protein interaction network is associated with Alzheimer’s disease pathology and causes age-dependent neurodegeneration 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Education, intelligence and Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence from a multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization study 93%
- Is genetic liability to ADHD and ASD causally linked to educational attainment? 93%
- Repurposing antihypertensive drugs for the prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian Randomization study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insulinopathies of the brain? Genetic overlap between somatic insulin-related and neuropsychiatric disorders 93%
- Polygenic resilience scores capture protective genetic effects for Alzheimer’s disease 93%
- Maternal Levels of Acute Phase Proteins in Early Pregnancy and Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Offspring 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain and Blood Transcriptome-Wide Association Studies Identify Five Novel Genes Associated with Alzheimer’s Disease 93%
- Exploring the genetic heterogeneity of Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence for genetic subtypes 93%
- Neurodevelopmental effects of genetic frontotemporal dementia mutations revealed by total intracranial volume differences 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.