Lymphocytopaenia is associated with severe SARS-CoV-2 disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Data
Brown, R. A. C.; Barnard, J.; Harris-Skillman, E.; Harbinson, B.; Dunne, B.; Drake, J.; Roche, S.; Harris, E.; Gunnel, J.; Frost, J.; Angus, B.; Hodgson, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundMost patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 have favourable outcomes, however some develop severe disease which may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome, multi-organ failure, and death. Markers that could predict patients at risk of poor outcomes would be extremely useful clinically. Evidence has emerged that low lymphocyte count is associated with increased disease severity. MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between lymphocyte count and severity of SARS-CoV-2 associated clinical disease. ResultsSeven papers were included in the meta-analysis. These papers included data from 2083 patients, 25% (n=521) with severe SAR-CoV-2 disease and 75% (n=1562) with non-severe SAR-CoV-2 disease. Heterogenicity was seen in the definition of severe disease. Metanalysis produced metamedians of 1x109/L (95% CI 1-1.1) and 0.7x109/L (95% CI 0.63-0.8) lymphocytes for patients with non-severe and severe disease respectively (p-value of p=0.006 Wilcoxon test). Calculation of metamedians from the two papers classifying severe disease according to death alone gave 1.1 1x109/L lymphocytes (95% CI 1.0-1.1) for survivors (n=163) and 0.63 1x109/L lymphocytes (95% CI 0.60-0.63) for non-survivors (n=253) of SAR-CoV-2 disease. ConclusionsLower lymphocyte counts are significantly associated with more severe disease in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lymphocytopenia may therefore be useful laboratory measure to allow prognostication of patients presenting with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Specific Dynamic Variations in the Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subsets in COVID-19 and Severe Influenza A Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study 91%
- Diagnostic performance of the combined nasal and throat swab in patients admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19 90%
- Serum neopterin levels in relation to mild and severe COVID-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Excessive matrix metalloproteinase-1 and hyperactivation of endothelial cells occurred in COVID-19 patients and were associated with the severity of COVID-19 90%
- Retrospective Analysis of Blood Biomarkers of Neurological Injury in Human Cases of Viral Infection and Bacterial Sepsis 90%
- Markers of immune activation and inflammation in individuals with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitivity of RT-PCR testing of upper respiratory tract samples for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised patients: a retrospective cohort study. 91%
- A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis of the Asymptomatic Proportion of PCR-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Community Settings 89%
- Crescentic Glomerulonephritis: A Single Center Observational Cohort Study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic utility of a Ferritin-to-Procalcitonin Ratio to differentiate patients with COVID-19 from those with Bacterial Pneumonia: A multicenter study 91%
- Initial SARS-CoV-2 viral load is associated with disease severity: a retrospective cohort study 90%
- Dynamic change and clinical relevance of post-infectious SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Laboratory Parameters Associated with Severe or Critical Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 93%
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of hematological and immunological markers in COVID-19 infection: A meta-analysis of 6320 patients 92%
- Factors Associated with Disease Severity and Mortality among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.