Severe underestimation of COVID-19 case numbers: effect of epidemic growth rate and test restrictions
Richterich, P.
Show abstract
To understand the scope and development of the COVID-19 pandemic, knowledge of the number of infected persons is essential. Often, the number of "confirmed cases", which is based on positive RT-PCR test results, is regarded as a reasonable indicator. However, limited COVID-19 test capacities in many countries are restricting the amount of testing that can be done. This can lead to the implementation of testing policies that restrict access to COVID-19 tests, and to testing backlogs and delays. As a result, confirmed case numbers can be significantly lower than the actual number of infections, especially during rapid growth phases of the epidemic. This study examines the quantitative relation between infections and reported confirmed case numbers for two different testing strategies, "limited" and "inclusive" testing, in relation to the growth rate of the epidemic. The results indicate that confirmed case numbers understate the actual number of infections substantially; during rapid growth phases where the daily growth rate can reach or exceed 30%, as has been seen in many countries, the confirmed case numbers under-report actual infections by up to 50 to 100-fold.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing required SARS-CoV-2 blanket testing rates for possible control of the outbreak in the epicentre Lusaka province of Zambia with consideration for asymptomatic individuals: a simple mathematical modelling study. 94%
- Emergence to dominance: Estimating time to dominance of SARS-CoV-2 variants using nonlinear statistical models 94%
- Interdependence between confirmed and discarded cases of dengue, chikungunya and Zika viruses in Brazil: A multivariate time-series analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating effects of intervention measures on COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan taking account of improving diagnostic capabilities using a modelling approach 94%
- Comparative Analysis of RT-PCR, RT-LAMP, and Antigen Testing Strategies for Effective COVID-19 Outbreak Control: A Modeling Study 92%
- Preventing a cluster from becoming a new wave in settings with zero community COVID-19 cases 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ongoing outbreak of COVID-19 in Iran: challenges and signs of concern with under-reporting of prevalence and deaths 92%
- COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan demonstrates the limitations of publicly available case numbers for epidemiological modelling. 92%
- Using an Agent-Based Model to Assess K-12 School Reopenings Under Different COVID-19 Spread Scenarios – United States, School Year 2020/21 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.