Back

Comparison of psychological distress and demand induced by COVID-19 during the lockdown period in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a cross-section study in a tertiary hospital

Li, Z.; Xia, X.; Wu, X.; Zhou, X.; Zang, Z.; Pu, L.

2020-04-17 nephrology
10.1101/2020.04.13.20063099
Show abstract

BackgroundSince the outbreak of COVID-19 in December 2019, it has spread rapidly and widely, bringing great psychological pressure to the public. In order to prevent the epidemic, lockdown was required in many areas of China, which led to inconvenience of treatment for dialysis patients. To explore the psychological distress and the psychological demand induced by COVID-19 in the patients undergoing dialysis and compare the difference between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal (PD) patients during the lockdown period. MethodsQuestionnaires were given to the dialysis patients in West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The Impact of Event Scale (IES) was used to investigate the patients trauma-related distress in response to COVID-19. Results232 eligible respondents were enrolled in this cross-section study, consisting of 156 PD patients and 76 HD patients. The median IES score for all the enrolled patients was 8.00 (2.00-19.00), which belonged to the subclinical dimension of post-traumatic stress symptoms. HD patients had a significant higher IES score than PD patients (11.50 vs 8.00) (p<0.05). HD patients already got more psychological support from the medical staff. There was no significant difference on further demand of psychological support between the two groups. In the multivariate regression analysis, we found that dialysis vintage, the impact of COVID-19 on the severity of illness and daily life, and confidence in overcoming the disease contributed to IES score (p<0.05). ConclusionsHD patients had more severe trauma-related stress symptoms than PD patients. When major public healthy events occurred, careful psychological estimate and sufficient psychological support should be provided to the dialysis patients, especially to the HD patients.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 14%
1.8× avg
2
BMC Nephrology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.2%
177× avg
3
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 0.6%
22× avg
4
BioMed Research International
Wiley · based on 11 published papers
#1
52× avg
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 2%
8.9× avg
6
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.3%
77× avg
7
Kidney360
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.7%
49× avg
8
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 3%
7.2× avg
9
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Elsevier BV · based on 10 published papers
#1
94× avg
10
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 48%
3.1%
11
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 27%
3.1%
12
Health Science Reports
Wiley · based on 11 published papers
#1
32× avg
13
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 4%
5.4× avg
14
PLOS Global Public Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 287 published papers
Top 14%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 15%
1.8× avg
16
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 4%
7.2× avg
17
Kidney International
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.9%
23× avg
18
Kidney International Reports
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.7%
21× avg
19
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 27 published papers
Top 4%
4.0× avg
20
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Elsevier BV · based on 35 published papers
Top 4%
4.7× avg
21
Epidemiology and Infection
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 80 published papers
Top 11%
2.2× avg