Back

The Estimated Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers during the Ongoing Epidemic of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China

Hu, F.-C.; Wen, F.-Y.

2020-04-17 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.11.20061838 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHow could we anticipate the progression of the ongoing epidemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China? As a measure of transmissibility, we aimed to estimate concurrently the time-varying reproduction number over time during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. MethodsWe extracted the epidemic data from the "Tracking the Epidemic" website of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention for the duration of January 19, 2020 and March 14, 2020. Then, we specified two plausible distributions of serial interval to apply the novel estimation method implemented in the incidence and EpiEstim packages to the data of daily new confirmed cases for robustly estimating the time-varying reproduction number in the R software. ResultsThe epidemic curve of daily new confirmed cases in China peaked around February 4-6, 2020, and then declined gradually, except the very high peak on February 12, 2020 owing to the added clinically diagnosed cases of the Hubei Province. Under two specified plausible scenarios for the distribution of serial interval, both curves of the estimated time-varying reproduction numbers fell below 1.0 around February 17-18, 2020. Finally, the COVID-19 epidemic in China abated around March 7-8, 2020, indicating that the prompt and aggressive control measures of China were effective. ConclusionSeeing the estimated time-varying reproduction number going downhill speedily was more informative than looking for the drops in the daily number of new confirmed cases during an ongoing epidemic of infectious disease. We urged public health authorities and scientists to estimate time-varying reproduction numbers routinely during an epidemic of infectious diseases and to report them daily to the public until the end of the epidemic.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Innovation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.2%
4
Annals of Translational Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
9
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
13
Cell Discovery
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
17
Science China Life Sciences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Virologica Sinica
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
27
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
29
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Virology Journal
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%