Accurate inference in parametric models reshapes neuroscientific interpretation and improves data-driven discovery
Sachdeva, P. S.; Livezey, J. A.; Dougherty, M. E.; Gu, B.-M.; Berke, J. D.; Bouchard, K. E.
Show abstract
A central goal of systems neuroscience is to understand the relationships amongst constituent units in neural populations and their modulation by external factors using high-dimensional and stochastic neural recordings. Statistical models, particularly parametric models, play an instrumental role in accomplishing this goal, because their fitted parameters can provide insight into the underlying biological processes that generated the data. However, extracting conclusions from a parametric model requires that it is fit using an inference procedure capable of selecting the correct parameters and properly estimating their values. Traditional approaches to parameter inference have been shown to suffer from failures in both selection and estimation. Recent development of algorithms that ameliorate these deficiencies raises the question of whether past work relying on such inference procedures have produced inaccurate systems neuroscience models, thereby impairing their interpretation. Here, we used the Union of Intersections, a statistical inference framework capable of state-of-the-art selection and estimation performance, to fit functional coupling, encoding, and decoding models across a battery of neural datasets. We found that, compared to baseline procedures, UoI inferred models with increased sparsity, improved stability, and qualitatively different parameter distributions, while maintaining predictive performance across recording modality, brain region, and task. Specifically, we obtained highly sparse functional coupling networks with substantially different community structure, more parsimonious encoding models, and decoding models that rely on fewer single-units. Together, these results demonstrate that accurate parameter inference reshapes interpretation in diverse neuroscience contexts. The ubiquity of model-based data-driven discovery in biology suggests that analogous results would be seen in other fields.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Embedding optimization reveals long-lasting history dependence in neural spiking activity 97%
- Constrained brain volume in an efficient coding model explains the fraction of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in sensory cortices 97%
- Modeling the Diverse Effects of Divisive Normalization on Noise Correlations 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Granger causality analysis for calcium transients in neuronal networks: challenges and improvements 97%
- An emerging view of neural geometry in motor cortex supports high-performance decoding 96%
- A statistical framework to assess cross-frequency coupling while accounting for modeled confounding effects 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sparse Epistatic Regularization of Deep Neural Networks for Inferring Fitness Functions 96%
- Increasing certainty in systems biology models using Bayesian multimodel inference 96%
- High-level cognition during story listening is reflected in high-order dynamic correlations in neural activity patterns 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal subspace identification for modeling discrete-continuous spiking and field potential population activity 96%
- Modeling and Inference Methods for Switching Regime-Dependent Dynamical Systems with Multiscale Neural Observations 95%
- Learning neural decoders without labels using multiple data streams 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.