Back

Refining the timing of recombination rate plasticity in response to temperature in Drosophila pseudoobscura

Altindag, U. H.; Shoben, C.; Stevison, L. S.

2020-04-10 genetics
10.1101/2020.04.10.036129 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Meiotic recombination rates vary in response to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Recently, heat stress has been shown to reveal plasticity in recombination rates in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Here, a combination of molecular genotyping and X-linked recessive phenotypic markers were used to investigate differences in recombination rates due to either heat stress or advanced maternal age. However, haplotype frequencies deviated from equal proportions for crosses using phenotypic markers, indicating viability selection. Interestingly, skews in haplotype frequency were condition-dependent, consistent with the fixation of alleles in the wild type stocks used that are unfit at high temperature. Evidence of viability selection due to heat stress in the wild type haplotypes was most apparent on days 7-9 when more mutant non-crossover haplotypes were recovered in comparison to wild type (p=2.2e-4). Despite the condition-dependent mutational load in both wild type and mutant stocks, an analysis of recombination rate plasticity revealed days 7-9 (p=0.0085) and day 9 (p=0.037) to be significantly higher due to heat stress and days 1-3 as significantly higher due to maternal age (p=0.025). Still, to confirm these findings, SNP genotyping markers were used to further investigate recombination rate. This analysis supported days 9-10 as significantly different due to heat stress in two pairs of consecutive SNP markers (p=0.018; p=0.015), suggesting this time period as when recombination rate is most sensitive to heat stress. This peak timing for recombination plasticity is consistent with D. melanogaster based on comparison of similarly timed key meiotic events, enabling future mechanistic work of temperature stress on recombination rate.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
14.2%
2
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
6
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
8
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
9
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
19
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
Journal of Insect Physiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
22
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
27
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%