Acceptance and preference for COVID-19 vaccination in health-care workers (HCWs)
Fu, C.; Wei, Z.; Pei, S.; Li, S.; Sun, X.; Liu, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundA major obstacle to successful coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine rollout is vaccine hesitancy. Acceptance of and preferences for COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers (HCWs) is critical, because they are a key target group for vaccination programs, and they are also highly influential to vaccine uptake in the wider population. This study sought to comparatively determine the acceptance of and preference for COVID-19 vaccination among HCWs and the general population. MethodsAn Internet-based, region-stratified discrete-choice experiment was conducted among 352 HCWs and 189 general population respondents recruited in March 2020 from 26 Chinese provinces. We accessed knowledge of disease, attitude towards and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. Several attributes (related to COVID-19 disease, COVID-19 vaccination and one social acceptance) were identified as key determinants of vaccine acceptance. ResultsHCWs had a more in-depth understanding of COVID-19 and showed a higher willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccines with lower effectiveness and/or more severe adverse effects compared to the general population. 76.4% of HCWs (vs 72.5% of the general population) expressed willingness to receive vaccination ({chi}2=2.904, p=0.234). High levels of willingness to accept influenza (65.3%) and pneumococcal (55.7%) vaccination were also seen in HCWs. Future COVID-19 disease incidence (OR: 4.367, 95% CI 3.721-5.126), decisions about vaccination among social contacts of respondents (OR 0.398, 95% CI 0.339-0.467), and infection risk >30% (OR 2.706, 95% CI 1.776-2.425) significantly increased the probability of vaccination acceptance in HCWs. ConclusionMulti-component interventions to address the key determinants of hesitancy in both HCWs and in the general population should be considered for COVID-19 vaccination programs.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The comparison of vaccine hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in China and the United States 98%
- Essential Workers’ COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Misinformation and Informational Needs in the Republic of North Macedonia 97%
- Underlying factors that influence the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine in a country with a high vaccination rate 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in the fourth country to authorize BNT162b2 during the first month of rollout 96%
- Public opinion on global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines: evidence from two nationally representative surveys in Germany and the United States 96%
- COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and its socio-demographic and emotional determinants: a multi-country cross-sectional study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Associated with the Acceptance and Willingness of COVID-19 Vaccination among Chinese Healthcare Workers 98%
- Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Senegal: a mixed study 96%
- Gender differences in the determinants of willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine among the working-age population in Japan 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Engagement in Algeria: A Population-based Study with Systematic Review of Studies from Arab Countries of the MENA Region 97%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 96%
- Vaccine Confidence and Hesitancy at the start of COVID-19 vaccine deployment in the UK: An embedded mixed-methods study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the UK: a prospective cohort study (CoVAccS – wave 3) 96%
- Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines and Perceptions about COVID-19 and Its Vaccines in Bangladesh 94%
- Demographic and psychological correlates of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination intentions in a sample of Canadian families 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.