Back

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection During Pregnancy In China: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Yin, M.; Zhang, L.; Deng, G.; Han, C.; Shen, M.; Sun, H.; Zeng, F.; Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Luo, Q.; Yao, D.; Wu, M.; Yu, S.; Chen, H.; Baud, D.; Chen, X.

2020-04-11 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2020.04.07.20053744 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been identified as the cause of the ongoing worldwide epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China and worldwide. However, there were few studies about the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnant women. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 31 pregnant women and 35 non-pregnant women from Jan 28 to Feb 28, 2020 to evaluate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Inflammatory indices were used to assess the severity of COVID-19. Evidence of vertical transmission was determined by laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 in amniotic fluid, placenta, neonatal throat and anal swab and breastmilk samples. FindingsCompared with non-pregnant women, pregnant women had a significantly lower proportion of fever (54{middle dot}8% vs. 87{middle dot}5%, p= 0.006), a shorter average interval from onset to hospitalization (7{middle dot}80 {+/-}7{middle dot}0d vs. 13{middle dot}2 {+/-} 8{middle dot}2d, p= 0.005), and a higher proportion of severe or critical COVID-19 (32{middle dot}3% vs. 11{middle dot}4%, p=0.039). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systematic immune-inflammation-based prognostic index (SII) were significantly higher on admission in severe/critical pneumonia group than moderate pneumonia group. We could not detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR in amniotic fluid, placenta, neonatal throat and anal swab and breastmilk samples. InterpretationThe clinical symptoms of COVID-19 in pregnant women were insidious and atypical, compared with those in non-pregnant patients. SII and NLR could be a useful marker to evaluate the severity of COVID-19. There was no evidence of vertical transmission during pregnancy with SARS-CoV-2 infection. FundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China and Research Funds for the Central Universities. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched PubMed, Embase and Web of science for articles published up to March 1st, 2020, using the keywords ("novel coronavirus" OR "2019 novel coronavirus" OR "2019-nCoV" OR COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2) AND (pregnancy OR "maternal infection" OR "fetal infection") AND "Cohort studies". We identified no published cohort studies on pregnant women with the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection. Added value of this studyFor this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed clinical records, laboratory findings, and chest CT scans from 31 pregnant women and 35 non-pregnant women from Jan 28 to Feb 28, 2020 to evaluate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Inflammatory indices were used to assess the severity of COVID-19. Evidence of vertical transmission was determined by laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 in amniotic fluid, placenta, neonatal throat and anal swab and breastmilk samples. Compared with non-pregnant women, pregnant women had a significantly lower proportion of fever (54{middle dot}8% vs. 87{middle dot}5%, p= 0.006), a shorter average interval from onset to hospitalization (7{middle dot}80 {+/-}7{middle dot}0d vs. 13{middle dot}2 {+/-} 8{middle dot}2d, p= 0.005), and a higher proportion of severe or critical COVID-19 (32{middle dot}3% vs. 11{middle dot}4%, p=0.039). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systematic immune-inflammation-based prognostic index (SII) were significantly higher on admission in severe/critical pneumonia group than moderate pneumonia group. Amniotic fluid, placenta, neonatal throat and anal swab and breastmilk samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and all results were negative. Implications of all the available evidenceThe clinical symptoms of COVID-19 in pregnant women were insidious and atypical, compared with those in non-pregnant patients. SII and NLR could be a useful marker to evaluate the severity of COVID-19. There was no evidence of vertical transmission during pregnancy with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
5
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
14
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Virology Journal
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
17
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
21
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
23
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
29
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%