Making sense of the Global Coronavirus Data: The role of testing rates in understanding the pandemic and our exit strategy
Potluri, R.; Lavu, D.
Show abstract
The Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) outbreak has caused havoc across the world. Subsequently, research on COVID-19 has focused on number of cases and deaths and predicted projections have focused on these parameters. We propose that the number of tests performed is a very important denominator in understanding the COVID-19 data. We analysed the number of diagnostic tests performed in proportion to the number of cases and subsequently deaths across different countries and projected pandemic outcomes. We obtained real time COVID-19 data from the reference website Worldometer at 0900 BST on Saturday 4th April, 2020 and collated the information obtained on the top 50 countries with the highest number of COVID 19 cases. We analysed this data according to the number of tests performed as the main denominator. Country wise population level pandemic projections were extrapolated utilising three models - 1) inherent case per test and death per test rates at the time of obtaining the data (4/4/2020 0900 BST) for each country; 2) rates adjusted according to the countries who conducted at least 100000 tests and 3) rates adjusted according to South Korea. We showed that testing rates impact on the number of cases and deaths and ultimately on future projections for the pandemic across different countries. We found that countries with the highest testing rates per population have the lowest death rates and give us an early indication of an eventual COVID-19 mortality rate. It is only by continued testing on a large scale that will enable us to know if the increasing number of patients who are seriously unwell in hospitals across the world are the tip of the iceberg or not. Accordingly, obtaining this information through a rapid increase in testing globally is the only way which will enable us to exit the COVID-19 pandemic and reduce economic and social instability.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking the Dynamics and Allocating Tests for COVID-19 in Real-Time: an Acceleration Index with an Application to French Age Groups and Départements * 91%
- Modeling and Prediction of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease Spreading in China Incorporating Human Migration Data 91%
- The First Wave of COVID-19 in Israel - Initial Analysis of Publicly Available Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- When Second Best Might be the Best: Using Hospitalization Data to Monitor the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic 94%
- Anticipating the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic 94%
- Adaptive time-dependent priors and Bayesian inference to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 public health measures validated on 31 countries 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of global case fatality rate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using meta-analyses: Comparison between calendar date and days since the outbreak of the first confirmed case. 94%
- Preliminary estimating the reproduction number of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Republic of Korea and Italy by 5 March 2020 92%
- Monitoring Disease Transmissibility of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease in Zhejiang, China 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Forecasting influenza incidence as an ordinal variable using machine learning 89%
- Inferring the number of COVID-19 cases from recently reported deaths 89%
- TRACKing Excess Deaths (TRACKED): an interactive online tool to monitor excess deaths associated with COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.