Back

Genetic Distance Calculation Based on Locality Sensitive Hashing

Gamage, G.; Pathirana, T.; Bandara, S.

2020-04-07 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.04.06.027250 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Measuring the genetic relatedness between different species is one of the major challenges in the field of phylogenetics. Genetic distance calculation based on DNA data is highly using a mechanism to determine inter species relationships. Genetic distance computation can be further bifurcated as alignment-free sequencing and alignment based sequencing. With this research we are presenting alignment free genetic distance calculation technique which is based on locality sensitive hashing(LSH). By this approach we are hashing large DNA sequences into numeric arrays and make comparison more efficient and simplified.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.3%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
6
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
10
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
● 38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
Journal of Computational Biology
○ 48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
12
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Genomics
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
14
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Computational Biology and Chemistry
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
BioMed Research International
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Biosystems
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
20
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Expert Systems with Applications
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Virus Research
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
188 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Methods
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.