Back

The Framework for the Prediction of the Critical Turning Period for Outbreak of COVID-19 Spread in China based on the iSEIR Model

Yuan, G. X.; Di, L.; Gu, Y.; Qian, G.; Qian, X.

2020-04-11 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.05.20054346 medRxiv
Show abstract

The goal of this study is to establish a general framework for predicting the so-called critical "Turning Period" in an infectious disease epidemic such as the COVID-19 outbreak in China early this year. This framework enabled a timely prediction of the turning period when applied to Wuhan COVID-19 epidemic and informed the relevant authority for taking appropriate and timely actions to control the epidemic. It is expected to provide insightful information on turning period for the worlds current battle against the COVID-19 pandemic. The underlying mathematical model in our framework is the individual Susceptible-Exposed-Infective-Removed (iSEIR) model, which is a set of differential equations extending the classic SEIR model. We used the observed daily cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan from February 6 to 10, 2020 as the input to the iSEIR model and were able to generate the trajectory of COVID-19 cases dynamics for the following days at midnight of February 10 based on the updated model, from which we predicted that the turning period of CIVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan would arrive within one week after February 14. This prediction turned to be timely and accurate, providing adequate time for the government, hospitals, essential industry sectors and services to meet peak demands and to prepare aftermath planning. Our study also supports the observed effectiveness on flatting the epidemic curve by decisively imposing the "Lockdown and Isolation Control Program" in Wuhan since January 23, 2020. The Wuhan experience provides an exemplary lesson for the whole world to learn in combating COVID-19.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%