Back

Explaining the Bomb-Like Dynamics of COVID-19 with Modeling and the Implications for Policy

Lin, G.; Strauss, A. T.; Pinz, M.; Martinez, D. A.; Tseng, K. K.; Schueller, E.; Gatalo, O.; Yang, Y.; Levin, S. A.; Klein, E. Y.; For the CDC MInD-Healthcare Program,

2020-04-07 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.05.20054338 medRxiv
Show abstract

Using a Bayesian approach to epidemiological compartmental modeling, we demonstrate the "bomb-like" behavior of exponential growth in COVID-19 cases can be explained by transmission of asymptomatic and mild cases that are typically unreported at the beginning of pandemic events due to lower prevalence of testing. We studied the exponential phase of the pandemic in Italy, Spain, and South Korea, and found the R0 to be 2.56 (95% CrI, 2.41-2.71), 3.23 (95% CrI, 3.06-3.4), and 2.36 (95% CrI, 2.22-2.5) if we use Bayesian priors that assume a large portion of cases are not detected. Weaker priors regarding the detection rate resulted in R0 values of 9.22 (95% CrI, 9.01-9.43), 9.14 (95% CrI, 8.99-9.29), and 8.06 (95% CrI, 7.82-8.3) and assumes nearly 90% of infected patients are identified. Given the mounting evidence that potentially large fractions of the population are asymptomatic, the weaker priors that generate the high R0 values to fit the data required assumptions about the epidemiology of COVID-19 that do not fit with the biology, particularly regarding the timeframe that people remain infectious. Our results suggest that models of transmission assuming a relatively lower R0 value that do not consider a large number of asymptomatic cases can result in misunderstanding of the underlying dynamics, leading to poor policy decisions and outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.6%
3
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
6
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
16
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
26
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%