Back

Revealing cellular heterogeneity and in vitro differentiation trajectory of cultured human endometrial mesenchymal-like stem cells using single-cell RNA sequencing

CAO, D.; Chan, R. W. S.; Ng, E. H. Y.; Danielsson, K. G.; Yeung, W. S. B.

2020-04-04 cell biology
10.1101/2020.04.03.004523 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Endometrial mesenchymal-like stem cells (eMSCs) are adult stem cells contributing to endometrial regeneration. One set of perivascular markers (CD140b+CD146+) have been widely used to enrich eMSCs. Although eMSCs are easily accessible for regenerative medicine and have long been studied, their cellular heterogeneity and molecular program controlling their expansion and differentiation in vitro remains largely unclear. In this study, we applied 10X genomics single-cell RNA sequencing to eMSCs cultured in vitro after microbeading from 7 donors to investigate cellular heterogeneity in an unbiased manner. Corresponding clonogenic progenies of eMSCs after culture for 14 days were also sequenced to construct the in vitro differentiation trajectory of eMSCs. Transcriptomic expression based clustering revealed several subpopulations in eMSCs. Each subpopulation manifested distinct functional characteristics associated with immunomodulation, proliferation, extracellular matrix organization and cell differentiation. Pseudotime trajectory analysis on eMSCs and their differentiated progenies identified in vitro differentiation hierarchy of eMSCs. Further ligand-receptor pair analysis found that WNT signaling, NOTCH signaling, TGF-beta signaling and FGF signaling were important regulatory pathways for eMSC self-renewal and differentiation. By comparing eMSCs to Whartons Jelly MSCs and adipose-derived MSCs, we found these 3 kinds of MSCs expressed largely overlapping differentiation (CD) genes and highly variable genes. In summary, we reveal for the first time high molecular and cellular heterogeneity in cultured eMSCs, and identify the key signaling pathways that may be important for eMSC differentiation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Stem Cells
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
3
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Experimental Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.3%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
9
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
11
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
16
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
Life Sciences
27 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
19
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
21
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%