Back

How to quit confinement? French scenarios face to COVID-19

Augeraud-Veron, E.

2020-04-06 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.02.20051342 medRxiv
Show abstract

A mathematical model is developed to study the spread of the COVID-19 epidemics in France. Data from French Public Agency of Health are considered to calibrate the model. The spread of the epidemics strongly depends on confinement measures. The aim of the paper is to predict the evolution of the epidemics under various scenarios that could be taken to quit confinement. The spread of the disease and its re-emergence strongly depends on these scenarios.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
The European Physical Journal Plus
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Infectious Disease Modelling
○ 54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
Nonlinear Dynamics
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
○ 133 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Public Health
○ 148 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Physical Review E
● 112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
12
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
● 23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
◐ 45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
● 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
● 17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
● 344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
19
Epidemics
○ 116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.0%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
○ 97 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Cureus
○ 68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Epidemiology and Infection
◐ 89 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Applied Sciences
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Physics
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
30
Journal of Public Health
◐ 24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.