Identifying therapeutic drug targets for rare and common forms of short stature
Estrada, K.; Froelich, S.; Wuster, A.; Bauer, C. R.; Sterling, T.; Clark, W. T.; Ru, Y.; Trinidad, M.; Nguyen, H. P.; Luu, A. T.; Wendt, D.; Yogalingam, G.; Yu, G. K.; LeBowitz, J. L.; Cardon, L. R.
Show abstract
While GWAS of common diseases has delivered thousands of novel genetic findings, prioritizing genes for translation to therapeutics has been challenging. Here, we propose an approach to resolve that issue by identifying genes that have both gain of function (GoF) and loss of function (LoF) mutations associated with opposing effects on phenotype (Bidirectional Effect Selected Targets, BEST). Bidirectionality is a desirable feature of the best targets because it implies both a causal role on the phenotype in one direction and that modulating the target activity might be safe and therapeutically beneficial in the other. We used height, a highly heritable trait and a model of complex diseases, to test our approach. Using 34,231 individuals with exome sequence data and height, we identified five genes (IGF1R, NPPC, NPR2, FGFR3, and SHOX) with evidence for bidirectional effects on stature. Rare protein-altering variants significantly increased risk for idiopathic short stature (ISS) (OR=2.75, p= 3.99x10-8). These genes are key members of the only two pathways successfully targeted for short stature: Growth Hormone/Insulin-like growth factor 1 axis and C-type Natriuretic peptide (CNP) for Achondroplasia, a monogenic form of dwarfism. We assayed a subset of NPR2 mutations and identified those with elevated (GoF) and diminished (LoF) activity and found that a polygenic score for height modulates the penetrance of pathogenic variants. We also demonstrated that adding exogenous CNP (encoded by NPPC) rescues the NPR2 haploinsufficiency molecular phenotype in a CRISPR-engineered cell line, thus validating its potential therapeutic treatment for inherited forms of short stature. Finally, we found that these BEST targets increase the probability of success in clinical trials above and beyond targets with other genetic evidence. Our results show the value of looking for bidirectional effects to identify and validate drug targets.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling mechanisms behind the pleiotropic effects of proximal 16p11.2 BP4-5 CNVs 94%
- The landscape of autosomal-recessive pathogenic variants in European populations reveals phenotype-specific effects 94%
- High-throughput splicing assays identify missense and silent splice-disruptive POU1F1 variants underlying pituitary hormone deficiency 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-genome sequencing analysis of anthropometric traits in 672,976 individuals reveals convergence between rare and common genetic associations 96%
- Evaluating transportability of in-vitro cellular models to in-vivo human phenotypes using gene perturbation data 95%
- Syndrome-informed phenotyping identifies a polygenic background for achondroplasia-like facial variation in the general population 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of the genetic basis of height in large Jewish nuclear families 94%
- Pleiotropy method identifies genetic overlap between orofacial clefts at multiple loci from GWAS of multi-ethnictrios 92%
- Genomic profiling of active vitamin D colonic responses in African- and European-Americans identifies an ancestry-related regulatory variant of POLB 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ancestral diversity improves discovery and fine-mapping of genetic loci for anthropometric traits - the Hispanic/Latino Anthropometry Consortium 94%
- Identification and validation of novel candidate risk genes in endocytic vesicular trafficking associated with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistulas 92%
- Functional characterization of pathogenic SATB2 missense variants identifies distinct effects on chromatin binding and transcriptional activity 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.