Back

In vivo selection for formate dehydrogenases with high efficiency and specificity towards NADP+

Calzadiaz Ramirez, L.; Calvo-Tusell, C.; Stoffel, G. M. M.; Lindner, S.; Osuna, S.; Erb, T. J.; Garcia-Borras, M.; Bar-Even, A.; Acevedo-Rocha, C. G.

2020-04-03 biochemistry
10.1101/2020.04.02.022350 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Efficient regeneration of cofactors is vital for the establishment of continuous biocatalytic processes. Formate is an ideal electron donor for cofactor regeneration due to its general availability, low reduction potential, and benign byproduct (CO2). However, formate dehydrogenases (FDHs) are usual specific to NAD+, such that NADPH regeneration with formate is challenging. Previous studies reported naturally occurring FDHs or engineered FDHs that accept NADP+, but these enzymes show low kinetic efficiencies and specificities. Here, we harness the power of natural selection to engineer FDH variants to simultaneously optimize three properties: kinetic efficiency with NADP+, specificity towards NADP+, and affinity towards formate. By simultaneously mutating multiple residues of FDH from Pseudomonas sp. 101, which exhibits no initial activity towards NADP+, we generate a library of >106 variants. We introduce this library into an E. coli strain that cannot produce NADPH. By selecting for growth with formate as sole NADPH source, we isolate several enzyme variants that support efficient NADPH regeneration. We find that the kinetically superior enzyme variant, harboring five mutations, has 5-fold higher efficiency and 13-fold higher specificity than the best enzyme previously engineered, while retaining high affinity towards formate. By using molecular dynamics simulations, we reveal the contribution of each mutation to the superior kinetics of this variant. We further determine how non-additive epistatic effects improve multiple parameters simultaneously. Our work demonstrates the capacity of in vivo selection to identify superior enzyme variants carrying multiple mutations which would be almost impossible to find using conventional screening methods.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Catalysis
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
3
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
5
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.7%
7
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
9
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
12
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
19
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
25
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
26
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
28
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Journal of Natural Products
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%