Back

Sustainable social distancing through facemask use and testing during the Covid-19 pandemic

Chowell, G.; Chowell, D.; Roosa, K.; Dhillon, R.; Srikrishna, D.

2020-04-06 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.01.20049981 medRxiv
Show abstract

We investigate how individual protective behaviors, different levels of testing, and isolation influence the transmission and control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on an SEIR-type model incorporating asymptomatic but infectious individuals (40%), we show that the pandemic may be readily controllable through a combination of testing, treatment if necessary, and self-isolation after testing positive (TTI) of symptomatic individuals together with social protection (e.g., facemask use, handwashing). When the basic reproduction number, R0, is 2.4, 65% effective social protection alone (35% of the unprotected transmission) brings the R below 1. Alternatively, 20% effective social protection brings the reproduction number below 1.0 so long as 75% of the symptomatic population is covered by TTI within 12 hours of symptom onset. Even with 20% effective social protection, TTI of 1 in 4 symptomatic individuals can substantially 'flatten the curve' cutting the peak daily incidence in half.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.9%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.9%
3
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.9%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
7
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
9
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
13
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
17
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
18
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
20
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
Demographic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
22
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
24
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%