Hyperactive end joining repair mediates resistance to DNA damaging therapy in p53-deficient cells
Kumar, R. J.; Chao, H. X.; Roberts, V. R.; Sullivan, A. R.; Shah, S. J.; Simpson, D. A.; Feng, W.; Wozny, A.-S.; Kumar, S.; Purvis, J. E.; Gupta, G. P.
10.1101/2020.04.01.021253 bioRxivShow abstract
TP53 mutations in cancer are associated with poor patient outcomes and resistance to DNA damaging therapies1-3. However, the mechanisms underlying treatment resistance in p53-deficient cells remain poorly characterized. Here, we show that p53-deficient cells exhibit hyperactive repair of therapy-induced DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), which is suppressed by inhibition of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). Single-cell analyses of DSB repair kinetics and cell cycle state transitions reveal an essential role for DNA-PK in suppressing S phase DNA damage and mitotic catastrophe in p53-deficient cells. Yet, a subset of p53-deficient cells exhibit intrinsic resistance to therapeutic DSBs due to a repair pathway that is not sensitive to DNA-PK inhibition. We show that p53 deficiency induces overexpression of DNA Polymerase Theta (Pol {theta}), which mediates an alternative end-joining repair pathway that becomes hyperactivated by DNA-PK inhibition4. Combined inhibition of DNA-PK and Pol {theta} restores therapeutic DNA damage sensitivity in p53-deficient cells. Thus, our study identifies two targetable DSB end joining pathways that can be suppressed as a strategy to overcome resistance to DNA-damaging therapies in p53-deficient cancers.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Fanconi anemia core complex promotes CtIP-dependent end-resection to drive homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks 97%
- PrimPol-dependent single-stranded gap formation mediates homologous recombination at bulky DNA adducts 97%
- WEE1 inhibitors trigger GCN2-mediated activation of the integrated stress response 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.