An updated and extended atlas for corresponding brain activation during task and rest
Tahedl, M.; Schwarzbach, J. V.
Show abstract
The complexity of our actions and thinking is likely reflected in functional brain networks. Independent component analysis (ICA) is a popular data-driven method to compute group differences between such networks. To aid interpretation of functional network analyses, Smith and colleagues proposed a template of ten functional networks identified in 36 healthy participants. They labeled them those components according to their similarity with statistical parameter maps from a metaanalysis of task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging studies (Smith et al., 2009). However, those original templates show substantial distortion with respect to what up-to date correction methods can achieve, such that trying to capture relevant effects within several cortical regions, especially the sensorimotor and orbitofrontal cortices, as well as the cerebellum may yield suboptimal results. Here, we provide a technical update and extension to the original templates. Using correlation analyses, we identified the best matching maps of each of the original ten templates to ICA maps from the Human Connectome Project (HCP). The HCP provides group-parcellations of a large dataset (n = 1003) with high-quality data. This approach yields a better fit of spatial component maps with anatomical borders and gray-/white-matter-boundaries. Additionally, we provide a version of the updated templates in CIFTI file-format, an emerging format in the neuroimaging community that combines surface-based data with subcortical/cerebellar data in volumetric space. The two formats we provide here offer an improvement on the templates by Smith et al., which should enhance sensitivity and interpretability of future research that compares functional networks between groups.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the laminar connectome of the human brain 97%
- Structure Can Predict Function in the Human Brain: A Graph Neural Network Deep Learning Model of Functional Connectivity and Centrality Based on Structural Connectivity 96%
- Microvascular structure variability explains variance in fMRI functional connectivity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The efficacy of resting-state fMRI denoising pipelines for motion correction and behavioural prediction. 96%
- Individual patterns of functional connectivity in neonates as revealed by surface-based Bayesian modeling 96%
- Evaluating the effect of denoising submillimeter auditory fMRI data with NORDIC 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.