From an invariant sensory code to a perceptual categorical code in second somatosensory cortex
Rossi-Pool, R.; Zainos, A.; Alvarez, M.; Romo, R.
Show abstract
A crucial role of cortical networks is the conversion of sensory inputs into perception. In the cortical somatosensory network, neurons of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) show invariant sensory responses, while frontal lobe neuron responses correlate with the animals perceptual behavior. But, where in the cortical somatosensory network are the sensory inputs transformed into perceptual behavior? Here, we report that in the secondary somatosensory cortex (S2), neurons with invariant sensory responses coexist with neurons whose responses correlate with the animals perceptual behavior. These distinct neural responses exhibit analogous timescales of intrinsic fluctuations, suggesting that they belong to the same hierarchical processing stage. Furthermore, during a non-demanding control task, the sensory responses remained unaltered while perceptual responses vanished. Conclusively, the S2 population responses exhibit intermediate dynamics between S1 and frontal lobe neurons. These results suggest that the conversion of touch into perception crucially depends on S2.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Amodal population clock in the primate medial premotor system for rhythmic tapping 97%
- In V4, pair-wise synchony and correlations depend on the structure of the population code 96%
- Trial-by-trial variability in cortical responses exhibits scaling in spatial correlations predicted from critical dynamics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Independent Activity Subspaces for Working Memory and Motor Preparation in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex 97%
- Distributed coding of stimulus magnitude in rodent prefrontal cortex 97%
- Dynamic organization of cerebellar climbing fiber response and synchrony in multiple functional modules reduces dimensions for reinforcement learning 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.