Back

Pharmacological Protein Inactivation By Targeting Folding Intermediates

Spagnolli, G.; Massignan, T.; Astolfi, A.; Biggi, S.; Brunelli, P.; Libergoli, M.; Ianeselli, A.; Orioli, S.; Boldrini, A.; Terruzzi, L.; Maietta, G.; Rigoli, M.; Lopez Lorenzo, N.; Fernandez, L. C.; Tosatto, L.; Linsenmeier, L.; Vignoli, B.; Petris, G.; Gasparotto, D.; Pennuto, M.; Guella, G.; Canossa, M.; Altmeppen, H. C.; Lolli, G.; Biressi, S.; Martin Pastor, M.; Requena, J. R.; Mancini, I.; Barreca, M. L.; Faccioli, P.; Biasini, E.

2020-04-01 biochemistry
10.1101/2020.03.31.018069 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent computational advancements in the simulation of biochemical processes allow investigating the mechanisms involved in protein regulation with realistic physics-based models, at an atomistic level of resolution. Using these techniques to study the negative regulation of the androgen receptor (AR), we discovered a key functional role played by non-native metastable states appearing along the folding pathway of this protein. This unexpected observation inspired us to design a completely novel drug discovery approach, named Pharmacological Protein Inactivation by Folding Intermediate Targeting (PPI-FIT), based on the rationale of negatively regulating protein expression by targeting folding intermediates. Here, PPI-FIT was tested for the first time on the cellular prion protein (PrP), a cell surface glycoprotein playing a key role in fatal and transmissible neurodegenerative pathologies known as prion diseases. We predicted the all-atom structure of an intermediate appearing along the folding pathway of PrP, and identified four different small molecule ligands for this conformer, all capable of selectively lowering the expression of the protein by promoting its degradation. Our data support the notion that the level of target proteins could be modulated by acting on their folding pathways, implying a previously unappreciated role for folding intermediates in the biological regulation of protein expression.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.