Back

Measuring ontogenetic shifts in central-place foraging insects: a case study with honey bees

Requier, F.; Henry, M.; Decourtye, A.; Brun, F.; Aupinel, P.; Rebaudo, F.; Bretagnolle, V.

2020-04-01 ecology
10.1101/2020.03.31.017582 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIMeasuring time-activity budgets over the complete individual lifespan is now possible for many animals with the recent advances of life-long individual monitoring devices. Although analyses of changes in the patterns of time-activity budgets have revealed ontogenetic shifts in birds or mammals, no such technique has been applied to date on insects. C_LIO_LIWe tested an automated breakpoint-based procedure to detect, assess and quantify shifts in the temporal pattern of the flight activities in honey bees. We assumed that the learning and foraging stages of honey bees will differ in several respects, to detect the age at onset of foraging (AOF). C_LIO_LIUsing an extensive dataset covering the life-long monitoring of 2,100 individuals, we compared the AOF outputs with the more conventional approaches based on arbitrary thresholds. We further evaluated the robustness of the different methods comparing the foraging time-activity budget allocations between the presumed foragers and confirmed foragers. C_LIO_LIWe revealed a clear-cut learning-foraging ontogenetic shift that differs in duration, frequency, and time of occurrence of flights. Although AOF appeared to be highly plastic among bees, the breakpoint-based procedure seems better able to detect it than arbitrary threshold-based methods that are unable to deal with inter-individual variation. C_LIO_LIWe developed the aof R-package including a broad range of examples with both simulated and empirical dataset to illustrate the simplicity of use of the procedure. This simple procedure is generic enough to be derived from any individual life-long monitoring devices recording the time-activity budgets of honey bees, and could propose new ecological applications of bio-logging to detect ontogenetic shifts in the behaviour of central-place foraging insects. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
69.1%
50% of probability mass above
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
3
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
5
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
7
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
12
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
13
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
14
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
18
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%
21
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%