Back

Loss of mutant TP53 does not impair the sustained proliferation, survival ormetastasis of diverse cancer cells

Wang, Z.; Vailllant, F.; Chang, C.; Riffkin, C.; Lieschke, E.; Diepstraten, S.; Huang, D.; Visvader, J. E.; Herold, M. J.; Kelly, G.; Strasser, A.

2020-03-31 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.03.30.015263 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The tumour suppressor TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer and these aberrations confer poor chemotherapeutic responses1-3. Point mutations typically cluster in the DNA binding domain, with certain hot-spot residues disproportionally represented1-4 These mutations abrogate binding of the TP53 transcription factor to DNA and thereby prevent upregulation of genes critical for tumour suppression (loss-of-function)1-3. Mutant TP53 is reported to additionally contribute to tumour development, sustained growth and metastasis not only through dominant-negative effects on wild-type TP535 but also through neomorphic gain-of-function (GOF) activities6. Understanding the contributions of these postulated attributes of mutant TP53 to the development and expansion of tumours will facilitate the design of rational therapeutic strategies. Here we used CRISPR/CAS9 to delete mutant TP53 in a panel of diverse human cancer cell lines. The loss of mutant TP53 expression had no impact on the survival, proliferative capacity or metabolic state of the tumour cells, nor did it sensitise them to cellular stresses and chemotherapeutic agents. These data suggest that putative GOF effects of mutant TP53 are not universally required for the sustained survival and proliferation of fully malignant cells. Therefore, therapeutic approaches that abrogate expression or function of mutant TP53 would not be expected to have substantial impact.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.