De novo reconstruction of microbial haplotypes by integrating statistical and physical linkage
cao, c.; he, j.; mak, l.; Perera, D.; Kwok, D.; Wang, J.; Li, M.; Mourier, T.; Gavriliuc, S.; Greenberg, M.; Morrissy, S.; Sycuro, L.; yang, g.; Jeffares, D. C.; Long, Q.
Show abstract
DNA sequencing technologies provide unprecedented opportunities to analyze within-host evolution of microorganism populations. Often, within-host populations are analyzed via pooled sequencing of the population, which contains multiple individuals or haplotypes. However, current next-generation sequencing instruments, in conjunction with single-molecule barcoded linked-reads, cannot distinguish long haplotypes directly. Computational reconstruction of haplotypes from pooled sequencing has been attempted in virology, bacterial genomics, metagenomics and human genetics, using algorithms based on either cross-host genetic sharing or within-host genomic reads. Here we describe PoolHapX, a flexible computational approach that integrates information from both genetic sharing and genomic sequencing. We demonstrated that PoolHapX outperforms state-of-the-art tools tailored to specific organismal systems, and is robust to within-host evolution. Importantly, together with barcoded linked-reads, PoolHapX can infer whole-chromosome-scale haplotypes from 50 pools each containing 12 different haplotypes. By analyzing real data, we uncovered dynamic variations in the evolutionary processes of within-patient HIV populations previously unobserved in single position-based analysis.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing the allele- and haplotype-specific copy number landscape of cancer genomes at single-cell resolution with CHISEL 96%
- Pangenome Graph Construction from Genome Alignment with Minigraph-Cactus 96%
- Multi-omics integration and regulatory inference for unpaired single-cell data with a graph-linked unified embedding framework 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.