Back

DNA methylation classification in diffuse glioma shows little spatial heterogeneity after adjusting for tumor purity

Verburg, N.; Barthel, F. P.; Anderson, K. J.; Johnson, K. C.; Koopman, M.; Yaqub, M.; Hoekstra, O.; Lammertsma, A.; Barkhof, F.; Pouwels, P.; Reijneveld, J. C.; Rozemuller, A.; Boellaard, R.; Taylor, M. D.; Das, S.; Costello, J. F.; Vandertop, W. P.; Wesseling, P.; De Witt Hamer, P. C.; Verhaak, R. G.

2020-03-29 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.03.28.012732 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intratumoral heterogeneity is a hallmark of diffuse gliomas. We used neuronavigation to acquire 133 image-guided and spatially-separated stereotactic biopsy samples from 16 adult patients with a diffuse glioma, which we characterized using DNA methylation arrays. Samples were obtained from regions with and without imaging abnormalities. Methylation profiles were analyzed to devise a three-dimensional reconstruction of genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity. Molecular aberrations indicated that tumor was found outside imaging abnormalities, underlining the infiltrative nature of this tumor and the limitations of current routine imaging modalities. We demonstrate that tumor purity is highly variable between samples and largely explains apparent epigenetic spatial heterogeneity. Indeed, we observed that DNA methylation subtypes are highly conserved in space after adjusting for tumor purity. Genome-wide heterogeneity analysis showed equal or increased heterogeneity among normal tissue when compared to tumor. These findings were validated in a separate cohort of 61 multi-sector tumor and 64 normal samples. Our findings underscore the infiltrative nature of diffuse gliomas and suggest that heterogeneity in DNA methylation is innate to somatic cells and not a characteristic feature of this tumor type.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.