Back

Determining structures of biomacromolecular complexes from ambiguous NMR restraints and cryoEM data

Walser, R.; Milbradt, A. G.

2020-03-29 biophysics
10.1101/2020.03.27.990309 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Integrated structural biology aims at combining different techniques to tackle challenging systems. Where individual techniques are not delivering structures of suitable quality, harnessing the strengths of various methods can often overcome this problem. X-ray crystallography and NMR have been the two most widely applied structural biology disciplines. In recent years cryoelectron microscopy (cryoEM) has become ever more powerful and is now capable of providing structures at resolutions comparable to those common in X-ray crystallography. Unfortunately, both NMR and cryoEM have inherent limitations on the system under study. However, the two techniques can be considered somewhat complementary as NMR has an upper and cryoEM a lower molecular weight (MW) limit. Here, we present a joint NMR and cryoEM methodology for the determination of biomacromolecular structures at the boundary region between the MW limits of the two techniques. The method relies on measuring chemical shift perturbations, which is the most readily accessible NMR parameter for characterizing the interaction of biomacromolecular complexes. Low-resolution cryoEM information yields global information on the shape of the complex and is used for complementing the local NMR data. We have successfully applied this method to the model system histidine-containing phosphoprotein (HPr) in complex with the glucose-specific acceptor protein IIAGlc from Escherichia coli.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.6%
2
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
6
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
12
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
14
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
20
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
21
Journal of Applied Crystallography
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
22
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%