How lethal is the novel coronavirus, and how many undetected cases there are? The importance of being tested.
Bastolla, U.
Show abstract
There is big concern for estimating the lethality and the extent of undetected infections associated with the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2 outbreak. While detailed epidemiological models are certainly needed, I suggest here an orthogonal approach based on a minimum number of parameters robustly fitted from the cumulative data easily accessible for all countries at the John Hopkins University database that became the worldwide reference for the pandemics. I show that, after few days from the beginning of the outbreak, the apparent death rate can be extrapolated to infinite time through regularized regression such as rescaled ridge regression. The variation from country to country of these extrapolated death rates appears to depend almost only (r2 = 0.91) on the ratio between performed tests and detected cases even when the apparent instantaneous lethality rates are as different as 9% in Italy and 0.4% in Germany. Extrapolating to the limit of infinite number of tests, I obtain a death rate of 0.012 {+/-} 0.012, in agreement with other estimates. The inverse relationship between the extrapolated death rate and the intensity tests allows estimating that more than 50% of cases were undetected in most countries, with more than 90% undetected cases in countries severely hit by the epidemics such as Italy. Finally, I propose to adopt the ratio between the cumulative number of recovered and deceased persons as an indicator that can anticipate the halting of the epidemics.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking the Dynamics and Allocating Tests for COVID-19 in Real-Time: an Acceleration Index with an Application to French Age Groups and Départements * 93%
- The Acceleration Index as a Test-Controlled Reproduction Number: Application to COVID-19 in France* 93%
- Modeling and Prediction of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease Spreading in China Incorporating Human Migration Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the Spread of Coronavirus Infection. A Mechanistic Model to Rate Strategies for Disease Management 93%
- Uncertainty and Inconsistency of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Effects with Multiple Competitive Statistical Models 93%
- Does susceptibility to novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infection differ by age?: Insights from mathematical modelling 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inferring age-specific differences in susceptibility to and infectiousness upon SARS-CoV-2 infection based on Belgian social contact data 92%
- Estimation of introduction and transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 in a prospective household study 92%
- A mechanistic and data-driven reconstruction of the time-varying reproduction number: Application to the COVID-19 epidemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 92%
- Reimagining the serocatalytic model for infectious diseases: a case study of common coronaviruses 92%
- To isolate, or not to isolate: a theoretical framework for disease control via contact tracing 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.