Back

On Inferring Additive and Replacing Horizontal Gene Transfers Through Phylogenetic Reconciliation

Kordi, M.; Kundu, S.; Bansal, M. S.

2020-03-29 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.03.27.010785 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Horizontal gene transfer is one of the most important mechanisms for microbial evolution and adaptation. It is well known that horizontal gene transfer can be either additive or replacing depending on whether the transferred gene adds itself as a new gene in the recipient genome or replaces an existing homologous gene. Yet, all existing phylogenetic techniques for the inference of horizontal gene transfer assume either that all transfers are additive or that all transfers are replacing. This limitation not only affects the applicability and accuracy of these methods but also makes it difficult to distinguish between additive and replacing transfers. Here, we address this important problem by formalizing a phylogenetic reconciliation framework that simultaneously models both additive and replacing transfer events. Specifically, we (1) introduce the DTRL reconciliation framework that explicitly models both additive and replacing transfer events, along with gene duplications and losses, (2) prove that the underlying computational problem is NP-hard, (3) perform the first experimental study to assess the impact of replacing transfer events on the accuracy of the traditional DTL reconciliation model (which assumes that all transfers are additive) and demonstrate that traditional DTL reconciliation remains highly robust to the presence of replacing transfers, (4) propose a simple heuristic algorithm for DTRL reconciliation based on classifying transfer events inferred through DTL reconciliation as being replacing or additive, and (5) evaluate the classification accuracy of the heuristic under a range of evolutionary conditions. Thus, this work lays the methodological and algorithmic foundations for estimating DTRL reconciliations and distinguishing between additive and replacing transfers. An implementation of our heuristic for DTRL reconciliation is freely available open-source as part of the RANGER-DTL software package from https://compbio.engr.uconn.edu/software/ranger-dtl/.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Algorithms for Molecular Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.9%
6
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
7
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
8
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
12
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
13
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
15
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.1%
18
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%