Back

Anticipatory responses along motion trajectories in awake monkey area V1

Benvenuti, G.; Chemla, S.; Boonman, A.; Perrinet, L.; Masson, G. S.; Chavane, F.

2020-03-29 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.03.26.010017 bioRxiv
Show abstract

What are the neural mechanisms underlying motion integration of translating objects? Visual motion integration is generally conceived of as a feedforward, hierarchical, information processing. However, feedforward models fail to account for many contextual effects revealed using natural moving stimuli. In particular, a translating object evokes a sequence of transient feedforward responses in the primary visual cortex but also propagations of activity through horizontal and feedback pathways. We investigated how these pathways shape the representation of a translating bar in monkey V1. We show that, for long trajectories, spiking activity builds-up hundreds of milliseconds before the bar enters the neurons receptive fields. Using VSDI and LFP recordings guided by a phenomenological model of propagation dynamics, we demonstrate that this anticipatory response arises from the interplay between horizontal and feedback networks driving V1 neurons well ahead of their feedforward inputs. This mechanism could subtend several perceptual contextual effects observed with translating objects. HighlightsO_LIOur hypothesis is that lateral propagation of activity in V1 contributes to the integration of translating stimuli C_LIO_LIConsistent with this hypothesis, we find that a translating bar induces anticipatory spiking activity in V1 neurons. C_LIO_LIA V1 model describes how this anticipation can arise from inter and intra-cortical lateral propagation of activity. C_LIO_LIThe dynamic of VSDi and LFP signals in V1 is consistent with the predictions made by the model. C_LIO_LIThe intra-cortical origin is further confirmed by the fact that a bar moving from the ipsilateral hemifield does not evoke anticipation. C_LIO_LIHorizontal and feedback input are not only modulatory but can also drive spiking responses in specific contexts. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.