Back

Genuage: a virtual reality platform for visualizing and analyzing multidimensional point cloud data

Blanc, T.; El Beheiry, M.; Masson, J.-B.; Hajj, B.

2020-03-29 biophysics
10.1101/2020.03.26.000448 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The quantity of experimentally recorded point cloud data, such generated in single-molecule experiments, is increasing continuously in both size and dimension. Gaining an intuitive understanding of the data and facilitating multi-dimensional data analysis remains a challenge. It is especially challenging when static distribution properties are not predictive of dynamical properties. Here, we report a new open-source software platform, Genuage, that enables the easy perception, interaction and analysis of complex multidimensional point cloud datasets by leveraging virtual reality. We illustrate the benefit of the Genuage with examples of three-dimensional static and dynamic localization microscopy datasets, as well as some synthetic datasets. Genuage has a large breadth of usage modes, due to its compatibility with arbitrary multidimensional data types extending beyond the single-molecule research community.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
11.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.6%
Similar papers in this journal
3
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Methods
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
SoftwareX
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
8
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
The European Physical Journal E
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
● 59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Journal of Molecular Biology
○ 232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.0%
14
Biological Imaging
◐ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Biophysical Reports
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
BMC Biology
○ 265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Journal of Applied Crystallography
● 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
● 12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
IUCrJ
● 32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
22
Journal of Microscopy
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Optics Express
● 26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Physics
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Open Research Europe
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
26
IEEE Access
● 35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Journal of Structural Biology
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Biophysical Journal
○ 631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Viruses
○ 332 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.