Back

A Simple Mathematical Model for Estimating the Inflection Points of COVID-19 Outbreaks

Ma, Z.

2020-03-27 health informatics
10.1101/2020.03.25.20043893 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundExponential-like infection growths leading to peaks (which could be the inflection points or turning points) are usually the hallmarks of infectious disease outbreaks including coronaviruses. To predict the inflection points, i.e., inflection time (Tmax) & maximal infection number (Imax) of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), we adopted a trial and error strategy and explored a series of approaches from simple logistic modeling (that has an asymptomatic line) to sophisticated tipping point detection techniques for detecting phase transitions but failed to obtain satisfactory results. MethodInspired by its success in diversity-time relationship (DTR), we apply the PLEC (power law with exponential cutoff) model for detecting the inflection points of COVID-19 outbreaks. The model was previously used to extend the classic species-time relationship (STR) for general DTR (Ma 2018), and it has two "secondary" parameters (computed from its 3 parameters including power law scaling parameter w, taper-off parameter d to overwhelm virtually exponential growth ultimately, and a parameter c related to initial infections): one that was originally used for estimating the potential or dark biodiversity is proposed to estimate the maximal infection number (Imax) and another is proposed to determine the corresponding inflection time point (Tmax). ResultsWe successfully estimated the inflection points [Imax, Tmax] for most provinces ({approx}85%) in China with error rates <5% in both Imax and Tmax. We also discussed the constraints and limitations of the proposed approach, including (i) sensitive to disruptive jumps, (ii) requiring sufficiently long datasets, and (iii) limited to unimodal outbreaks.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.2%
3
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
8
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
13
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%