Back

A Simple Mathematical Model for Estimating the Inflection Points of COVID-19 Outbreaks

Ma, Z.

2020-03-27 health informatics
10.1101/2020.03.25.20043893
Show abstract

BackgroundExponential-like infection growths leading to peaks (which could be the inflection points or turning points) are usually the hallmarks of infectious disease outbreaks including coronaviruses. To predict the inflection points, i.e., inflection time (Tmax) & maximal infection number (Imax) of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), we adopted a trial and error strategy and explored a series of approaches from simple logistic modeling (that has an asymptomatic line) to sophisticated tipping point detection techniques for detecting phase transitions but failed to obtain satisfactory results. MethodInspired by its success in diversity-time relationship (DTR), we apply the PLEC (power law with exponential cutoff) model for detecting the inflection points of COVID-19 outbreaks. The model was previously used to extend the classic species-time relationship (STR) for general DTR (Ma 2018), and it has two "secondary" parameters (computed from its 3 parameters including power law scaling parameter w, taper-off parameter d to overwhelm virtually exponential growth ultimately, and a parameter c related to initial infections): one that was originally used for estimating the potential or dark biodiversity is proposed to estimate the maximal infection number (Imax) and another is proposed to determine the corresponding inflection time point (Tmax). ResultsWe successfully estimated the inflection points [Imax, Tmax] for most provinces ({approx}85%) in China with error rates <5% in both Imax and Tmax. We also discussed the constraints and limitations of the proposed approach, including (i) sensitive to disruptive jumps, (ii) requiring sufficiently long datasets, and (iii) limited to unimodal outbreaks.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Briefings in Bioinformatics
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
11.4%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 22%
7.8%
3
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
based on 17 papers
Top 0.5%
6.5%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 77%
3.0%
6
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
7
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
8
Bioinformatics
based on 24 papers
Top 0.4%
2.9%
9
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 5%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 12%
2.5%
12
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 4%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
13
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
2.3%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
based on 36 papers
Top 0.9%
2.3%
15
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.4%
1.9%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 9%
1.6%
17
Advanced Science
based on 12 papers
Top 0.7%
1.6%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
19
Patterns
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
22
Gut Microbes
based on 15 papers
Top 1.0%
1.4%
23
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
24
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
25
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 18%
1.2%
27
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
29
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
30
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%