Back

Modeling of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Proteins by Machine Learning and Physics-Based Refinement

Heo, L.; Feig, M.

2020-03-28 biophysics
10.1101/2020.03.25.008904 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein structures are crucial for understanding their biological activities. Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there is an urgent need to understand the biological behavior of the virus and provide a basis for developing effective therapies. Since the proteome of the virus was determined, some of the protein structures could be determined experimentally, and others were predicted via template-based modeling approaches. However, tertiary structures for several proteins are still not available from experiment nor they could be accurately predicted by template-based modeling because of lack of close homolog structures. Previous efforts to predict structures for these proteins include efforts by DeepMind and the Zhang group via machine learning-based structure prediction methods, i.e. AlphaFold and C-I-TASSER. However, the predicted models vary greatly and have not yet been subjected to refinement. Here, we are reporting new predictions from our in-house structure prediction pipeline. The pipeline takes advantage of inter-residue contact predictions from trRosetta, a machine learning-based method. The predicted models were further improved by applying molecular dynamics simulation-based refinement. We also took the AlphaFold models and refined them by applying the same refinement method. Models based on our structure prediction pipeline and the refined AlphaFold models were analyzed and compared with the C-I-TASSER models. All of our models are available at https://github.com/feiglab/sars-cov-2-proteins.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.9%
3
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.5%
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.0%
7
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
12
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
IUCrJ
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
17
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.1%
21
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
25
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%