Back

A model to estimate bed demand for COVID-19 related hospitalization

Zhang, T.; McFarlane, K.; Vallon, J.; Yang, L.; Xie, J.; Blanchet, J.; Glynn, P.; Staudenmayer, K.; Schulman, K.; Scheinker, D.

2020-03-26 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.03.24.20042762 medRxiv
Show abstract

As of March 23, 2020 there have been over 354,000 confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in over 180 countries, the World Health Organization characterized COVID-19 as a pandemic, and the United States (US) announced a national state of emergency.1, 2, 3 In parts of China and Italy the demand for intensive care (IC) beds was higher than the number of available beds.4, 5 We sought to build an accessible interactive model that could facilitate hospital capacity planning in the presence of significant uncertainty about the proportion of the population that is COVID-19+ and the rate at which COVID-19 is spreading in the population. Our approach was to design a tool with parameters that hospital leaders could adjust to reflect their local data and easily modify to conduct sensitivity analyses. We developed a model to facilitate hospital planning with estimates of the number of Intensive Care (IC) beds, Acute Care (AC) beds, and ventilators necessary to accommodate patients who require hospitalization for COVID-19 and how these compare to the available resources. Inputs to the model include estimates of the characteristics of the patient population and hospital capacity. We deployed this model as an interactive online tool.6 The model is implemented in R 3.5, RStudio, RShiny 1.4.0 and Python 3.7. The parameters used may be modified as data become available, for use at other institutions, and to generate sensitivity analyses. We illustrate the use of the model by estimating the demand generated by COVID-19+ arrivals for a hypothetical acute care medical center. The model calculated that the number of patients requiring an IC bed would equal the number of IC beds on Day 23, the number of patients requiring a ventilator would equal the number of ventilators available on Day 27, and the number of patients requiring an AC bed and coverage by the Medicine Service would equal the capacity of the Medicine service on Day 21. In response to the COVID-19 epidemic, hospitals must understand their current and future capacity to care for patients with severe illness. While there is significant uncertainty around the parameters used to develop this model, the analysis is based on transparent logic and starts from observed data to provide a robust basis of projections for hospital managers. The model demonstrates the need and provides an approach to address critical questions about staffing patterns for IC and AC, and equipment capacity such as ventilators.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
3
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
5
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
14
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
19
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
24
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%