Back

Gatekeeper transcription factors regulate switch between lineage preservation and cell plasticity

Ray, T.; Shah, A.; Bulla, G. A.; Ray, P. S.

2020-03-20 cell biology
10.1101/2020.03.19.999433 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reprogramming somatic cells to pluripotency by repressing lineage-instructive transcription factors (TFs) alone has not been pursued because lineage specification is thought to be regulated by transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs) comprising of multiple TFs rather than by single pivotal "gatekeeper" TFs. Utilizing an intra-species somatic cell hybrid model, we identified Snai2 and Prrx1 as the most critical determinants of mesenchymal commitment in rat embryonic fibroblasts (REFs) and demonstrate that siRNA-mediated knockdown of either of these master regulators is adequate to convert REFs into functional adipocytes, chondrocytes or osteocytes without requiring exogenous TFs or small molecule cocktails. Furthermore, knockdown of Snai2 alone proved sufficient to transform REFs to dedifferentiated pluripotent stem-like cells (dPSCs) that formed embryoid bodies capable of triple germ-layer differentiation. These findings suggest that inhibition of a single gatekeeper TF in a lineage committed cell is adequate for acquisition of cell plasticity and reprogramming without requiring permanent genetic modification. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=143 SRC="FIGDIR/small/999433v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1acdb83org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17fb3ddorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f994c9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@197541e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Schematic diagram depicting transdifferentiation of REFs into adipocytes, osteocytes, chondrocytes and dedifferentiation into MSCs on individual treatment with siSnai2 or siPrrx1. dPSCs were generated only in the siSnai2 group.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
7
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
8
EMBO Reports
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
10
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
12
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
16
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.5%
25
European Journal of Cell Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%
27
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
28
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%