Back

Highly Sensitive Identification of Lymphatic and Hematogenous Metastasis Routes of Novel Radiolabeled Exosomes Using Non-invasive PET Imaging

Jung, K.; Kim, Y.-H.; Chung, S.-J.; Kang, K. W.; Rhee, S.; Pratx, G.; Chung, J.-K.; Youn, H.

2020-03-18 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.03.17.995860 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Clinically, there has been significant interest in the use of exosomes for diagnostic applications as promising biomarkers and therapeutic applications as therapeutic vehicles. However, knowledge of in vivo physiological biodistribution of exosomes was difficult to assess until now. Physiological distribution of exosomes in the body must be elucidated for clinical application. In this study, we aimed to develop reliable and novel methods to monitor biodistribution of exosomes using in vivo PET and optical imaging. MethodsExosomes were isolated from cultured medium of 4T1, mouse breast cancer cells. Exosomes were labeled with Cy7 and 64Cu (or 68Ga). In mice, radio/fluorescent dye-labeled exosomes were injected through the lymphatic routes (footpad injection) and hematogenous metastatic routes (tail vein injection). Fluorescence and PET images were obtained and quantified. Radio-activity of ex vivo organs was measured by gamma counter. ResultsPET signals from exosomes in the lymphatic metastatic route were observed in the draining lymph nodes, which are not distinguishable with optical imaging. Immunohistochemistry revealed greater uptake of exosomes in brachial and axillary lymph nodes than inguinal lymph node. After administration through the hematogenous metastasis pathway, accumulation of exosomes was clearly observed in PET images in the lungs, liver, and spleen, showing results similar to ex vivo gamma counter data. ConclusionExosomes from tumor cells were successfully labeled with 64Cu (or 68Ga) and visualized by PET imaging. These results suggest that this cell type-independent, quick, and easy exosome labeling method using PET isotopes could provide valuable information for further application of exosomes in the clinic.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theranostics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.1%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
4
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
6
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.0%
8
Neoplasia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.6%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
11
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
17
Lab Animal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
22
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%