Back

Evaluation of recombinant nucleocapsid and spike proteins for serological diagnosis of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Zhang, P.; Gao, Q.; Wang, T.; Ke, Y.; Mo, F.; Jia, R.; Liu, W.; Liu, L.; Zheng, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Hao, K.; Yang, R.; Li, S.; Lin, C.; Zhao, Y.

2020-03-20 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.03.17.20036954 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe colloidal gold immunochromatography assay (GICA) is a rapid diagnostic tool for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections. However, with significant numbers of false negatives, improvements to GICA are needed. MethodsSix recombinant HCoV-19 nucleocapsid and spike proteins were prepared and evaluated. The optimal proteins were employed to develop a sandwich-format GICA strip to detect total antibodies (IgM and IgG) against HCoV-19. GICAs performance was assessed with comparison of viral RNA detection. ResultsRecombinant HCoV-19 proteins were obtained, including three prokaryotically expressed rN, rN1, rN2 nucleocapsid proteins, and three eukaryotically expressed rS1, rS-RBD, rS-RBD-mFc spike proteins. The recombinant proteins with the highest ELISA titers (rS1 and rS-RBD-mFc) against coronavirus-specific IgM and IgG were chosen for GICA development. The GICA has a sensitivity and specificity of 86.89% (106/122) and 99.39% (656/660), respectively. Furthermore, 65.63% (21/32) of the clinically confirmed but RT-PCR negative samples were GICA positive. ConclusionsThe eukaryotically-expressed spike proteins (rS1and rS-RBD-mFc) are more suitable than the prokaryotically expressed nucleocapsid proteins for HCoV-19 serological diagnosis. The GICA sandwich used to detect total antibodies is a powerful complement to the current standard RNA-based tests.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
5
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
6
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
26
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%