Back

Communicative hand gestures as an implicit measure of artificial limb embodiment and daily usage

Maimon-Mor, R. O.; Obasi, E.; Lu, J.; Odeh, N.; Kirker, S.; MacSweeney, M.; Goldin-Meadow, S.; Makin, T. R.

2020-03-16 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2020.03.11.20033928
Show abstract

When people talk, they move their hands to enhance meaning. Here we ask whether people spontaneously use their artificial limbs (prostheses) to gesture, and whether prosthesis gesture behaviour relates to everyday prosthesis use and perceived embodiment. One-handed participants with congenital and acquired hand loss and two-handed controls participated in gesture-facilitating tasks, measured using acceleration monitors and further validated with offline video coding. Everyday functional prosthesis use and perceived prosthesis embodiment were assessed using questionnaires. Perhaps surprisingly, one- and two-handed participants did not differ in the amount of gestures they produced. However, they did differ in their gesture profile. One-handers performed more, and bigger, movements with their intact hand while gesturing relative to their prosthesis, whereas two-handers produced more equal movements across hands. Importantly, one-handers who incorporated their prosthesis more into gesturing, that is -- produced gestures that were more similar to their two-handed counterparts -- also showed more frequent prosthesis use in day-to-day life. Although as a group, one-handers only marginally agreed that their prosthesis feels like a body-part, people reporting positive embodiment also showed great prosthesis habits, both for communication and daily function. We propose that measuring gesture behaviour in prosthesis-users can be used as an implicit and objective clinical tool to monitor and assess successful prosthesis adoption.

Matching journals

1
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
#1
150× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 25%
17.2%
3
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 17%
1.9× avg
4
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
SAGE Publications · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.6%
45× avg
5
Gait & Posture
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.5%
50× avg
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
IOP Publishing · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.5%
48× avg
7
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 5%
4.3× avg
8
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 4%
6.0× avg
9
Sensors
MDPI AG · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
18× avg
10
iScience
Elsevier BV · based on 74 published papers
Top 2%
8.5× avg
11
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 7%
3.1× avg
12
Scientific Data
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 30 published papers
Top 2%
9.8× avg
13
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 42%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.8%
19× avg
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · based on 100 published papers
Top 9%
2.7× avg
16
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
9.7× avg
17
Stroke
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 2%
6.1× avg
18
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 3%
5.0× avg
19
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
6.9× avg
20
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 6%
2.8× avg
21
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 42%
0.7%