Back

Assessment of Potential Health and Genetic Impacts in Releasing Confiscated Paroaria coronata and Saltator similis

Cruz, C. E. F. d.; Funkler, G. R.; Zani, A. L. S.; Wagner, P. G. C.; Segura, L. N.; Andretta, I.; Fagundes, N. J. R.

2020-03-10 zoology
10.1101/2020.03.10.985473 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Illegal capture and trade of wild birds has long been a threat to biodiversity. Translocation—the release of individuals from one location into another—is a useful conservation tool in the management of species. However, both health (such as different pathogens) and adaptive (such as local adaptation), differences among populations must be taken into account, as both can impact the recipient population negatively. Here, we provide health and genetic information to support release planning for two of the most trafficked Brazilian wild bird species (Paroaria coronata and Saltator similis). We focused on two fundamental questions: Are there significant differences in pathogen load between wild and captive populations? Is there significant genetic structure among populations? In total, 223 free-living birds were captured, sampled, and released at the same site. Devices and live decoys characteristics were top factors influencing captures. We tested blood, feces, and oropharyngeal swabs from free-ranging (n=101) and confiscated (n=92) birds for Newcastle disease virus, Salmonella spp., and Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Genetic structure among populations was investigated using mtDNA in a subsample of these birds. We found no evidence for Newcastle disease virus and Salmonella spp. in seized and free-living birds from both species. However, seized P. coronata and S. similis may be potential sources of M. gallisepticum. We found significant but low genetic structure among populations occurring in different Biomes (ΦCT=0.26 for P. coronata; ΦCT=0.13 for S. similis) and no significant structure among populations occurring in the Pampa Biome. These results suggest that while it may be important to screen seized birds for avian pathogens, genetic structure among populations seems to be of lesser concern when planning the release of seized songbirds in the wild.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.7%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
5
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
9
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
11
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
20
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
28
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
30
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%