Back

Using the Price equation to detect inclusive fitness in class-structured populations

Rodrigues, A. M. M.

2020-03-09 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.03.09.982892 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inclusive fitness theory has transformed the study of adaptive evolution since 1964, contributing to significant empirical findings. However, its status as a theory has been challenged by the proposals of several alternative frameworks. Those challenges have been countered by analyses that use the Price equation and the regression method. The Price equation is a universal description of evolutionary change, and the partitioning of the Price equation using the regression method immediately yields Hamiltons rule, which embodies the main tenets of inclusive fitness. Hamiltons rule captures the intensity and direction of selection acting on social behaviour and its underlying causal structure. Recent work, however, has suggested that there is an anomaly in this approach: in some cases, the regression method fails to estimate the correct values of the variables in Hamiltons rule and the causal structure of the behaviour. Here, I address this apparent anomaly. I argue that the failure of the simple regression method occurs because social players vary in baseline fecundity. I reformulate the Price equation and regression method to recover Hamiltons rule and I show that the method correctly estimates its key variables. I show that games where baseline fecundity varies among individuals represent a more general set of games that unfold in class-structured populations. This framework supports the robustness and validity of inclusive fitness.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.7%
2
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
5
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.6%
8
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
9
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
11
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
13
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
15
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
17
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.7%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
20
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%