Back

Diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection by Detection of Nucleocapsid Protein

Diao, B.; Wen, K.; CHEN, J.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Han, C.; Chen, J.; Pan, Y.; Chen, L.; Dan, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Deng, G.; Zhou, H.; Wu, Y.

2020-03-10 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.03.07.20032524
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDNucleic acid test and antibody assay have been employed in the diagnosis for SARS-CoV-2 infection, but the use of viral antigen for diagnosis has not been successfully developed. Theoretically, viral antigen is the specific marker of the virus and precedes antibody appearance within the infected population. There is a clear need of detection of viral antigen for rapid and early diagnosis. METHODSWe included a cohort of 239 participants with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection from 7 centers for the study. We measured nucleocapsid protein in nasopharyngeal swab samples in parallel with the nucleic acid test. Nucleic acid test was taken as the reference standard, and statistical evaluation was taken in blind. We detected nucleocapsid protein in 20 urine samples in another center, employing nasopharyngeal swab nucleic acid test as reference standard. RESULTSWe developed a fluorescence immunochromatographic assay for detecting nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab sample and urine within 10 minutes. 100% of nucleocapsid protein positive and negative participants accord with nucleic acid test for same samples. Further, earliest participant after 3 days of fever can be identified by the method. In an additional preliminary study, we detected nucleocapsid protein in urine in 73.6% of diagnosed COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONSThose findings indicate that nucleocapsid protein assay is an accurate, rapid, early and simple method for diagnosis of COVID-19. Appearance of nucleocapsid protein in urine coincides our finding of the SARS-CoV-2 invading kidney and might be of diagnostic value.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 40%
12.7%
2
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 0.9%
7.7%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 28%
6.5%
4
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 0.5%
5.1%
5
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 1%
4.6%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 3%
4.6%
8
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 4%
2.8%
9
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
based on 22 papers
Top 0.9%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
12
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 4%
1.6%
13
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 16%
1.3%
15
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 25%
0.8%
17
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 14%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 40%
0.8%
20
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
based on 15 papers
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Kidney International
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Health Science Reports
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
27
mSphere
based on 27 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
28
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 11%
0.7%
29
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 5%
0.7%